QotD

Jul 13, 2005 05:25


"Ethics in a Nutshell", by davechicken, 2005-05-06: Morality: The act of wearing socks. Thus: Moral person: One who wears socks.
Amorality: The state of one who has no socks.
Immorality: The state of one who has socks and chooses not to wear them.
Weakness of Will: The state of having socks but being ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

(The comment has been removed)

ice_hesitant July 13 2005, 19:13:27 UTC
Your hatred of ethics makes baby LPetrazickis cry.^-^

Reply


red_frog July 13 2005, 14:56:27 UTC
Making someone who wears two pairs at the same time hopelessly oversocksed.

Thank you, I'll be here all week.

Reply


qfyd July 13 2005, 15:58:24 UTC
What would take make Einstein? He stopped wearing socks because his always got holes in them far too quickly...

Reply


justgus37 July 13 2005, 17:03:22 UTC
So, what about hose? Are they considered socks? How about footy pajamas? Or the toe socks that japanese kibuki players (and ninjas) wear? Are panyhose pants or socks? We extend the analogy...

Metaphysics: The act of defining what is a sock.
Politics: Government that either requires ro allows people to wear socks and prevents or tolerates when people do not.

Reply

realinterrobang July 13 2005, 18:01:30 UTC
To which we can add...

Philosophy: The gnosis of socks.
Sociology: The epistemology of socks.

I need to go back to school... ;)

Reply

dglenn July 14 2005, 08:08:18 UTC
Hosen, pantyhose, and tights count as socks.

Not sure about footy pajamas yet.

Reply


uilos July 14 2005, 03:43:41 UTC
What about the people who go out to buy more socks rather than launder the dirty ones that they have?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up