Over on
barbarienne's LJ, she's posted about a cadre of Kindle owners who are making claims that
the big publishers don't want ebooks to succeed as a viable format for reading. I leave it in her capable hands to debunk that nonsense. However, one comment that I read there, and have seen elsewhere, drives me insane.
The comment is that "printing makes up
(
Read more... )
(Granted, they also sell E-ARCs at $15 each for three months before the release of each book-but other publishers only sell e-books starting at book release, so that would be comparing apples and oranges. But even then, $15 is a lot less than hardcover price.)
Nobody who complains about how printing costs make up only $2 out of the price of a $26 hardcover ever seems to want to address that.
Reply
Reply
And, just about every person that I've talked to in publishing about this subject before this Macmillan/Amazon thing has said that printing, paper and ink are the major cost of a book.
Now they're all telling me that the largest cost is editorial.
I just want to see numbers at this point.
Reply
Better numbers, I can't provide. But then, Chrysler has never justified the underlying costs of my minivan to me. Nor Disney the underlying costs of my admission ticket to DisneyWorld. I have to take it on faith that the experience and functionality of those purchases is worth the cover price. I can only ballpark figures, and give an overview of underlying costs that too many people think we can do without.
Reply
http://jaylake.livejournal.com/2056406.html?view=14636246
Reply
Leave a comment