(Untitled)

Mar 02, 2005 11:30

There are some issues I need to resolve regarding the rules, and I want your input before I finalize them ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

killtacular March 2 2005, 18:54:39 UTC
are we going to seed the participants, or is it going to be set up at random? 'cause that's how you could resolve the topic selection thing (higher seed picks the side). or you could do it at random.

As for the topics, you could recycle some of the ones that turned out to be good debates, I suppose.

Reply

the__lord March 2 2005, 19:03:49 UTC
I've got a methodology in my head for generating the schedule. I'm basically going to put everyone in groups of four (only for scheduling purposes), who I've observed arguing somewhat along the same idealogical lines. Then each person will debate the 12 people outside their group. Seeding would be difficult because it would give certain people an unfair advantage, and I can't think of anything to base the seedings on.

Reply

killtacular March 2 2005, 19:06:21 UTC
hmm, that seems to work well. although you could always use your alleged omniscience regarding the seeding structure, no?

Reply

the__lord March 2 2005, 19:10:22 UTC
Well, all you lower beings are the same to me. I can't tell any of you apart.

Reply

killtacular March 2 2005, 19:13:00 UTC
so you're saying You can't tell apart a decadent atheist like me from a devout You-worshipper? sounds like a good deal to me.

Reply

the__lord March 2 2005, 19:16:47 UTC
That's right. You're all gonna burn anyway. The whole thing's just a sick joke. We should debate this.

Reply

killtacular March 2 2005, 19:18:31 UTC
on a serious note, i'd dig a "is it rational to believe in God" one (not is it irrational, since that is trivially no, but it may be arational). ok, maybe not.

Reply

the__lord March 2 2005, 19:19:45 UTC
We'll have something along those lines.

Reply

killtacular March 2 2005, 19:24:40 UTC
cool cool

Reply


Leave a comment

Up