Me, Ae, and Moral: The Ideals of perception over that of morals
OH GOD........I just cannot take this much more. Endlessly I go to school in find stupidity in everything. It just is so painful and frighting to witness. I cannot bear witness to this much longer.
Ae: Well I'am chaging my name to Ae.
Me: What changed?
Ae: I'am spelling it with an a and a e.
Me: oh? that's really stupid.
Ae: No it's artistic and interesting. Besides your opinion is corrupt as you are naturally vain and jealous.
Me: Vainity and justices have very little to do with this. you just your name for no phentic reason but rather for a very Vain asthetic one.
Ae: No I changed it for philosphical and artistic reason it is Asthetics with purpose rather then for vain concepts.
Me: Moral help me out plz.
Moral: The truth is really in that your both roight. Me you precieve that Ae's new name is vain as you cannot comprehend his perception. Any asthetic without a philosophic meaning is vainity, this is Me's perception. Ae has the Philosophy thus the justification for his asthetic name change.
Me: So, in order for me to understand Ae's name change he has to explain his reasoning.
Ae:My reasoning is in that it is artistic and I like it.
Moral: Ae you have no justification your being vain. Your reasons are selfish albeit they hurt no one. Me, Ae's reasoning showed that he was vain thus though you were roight you were working off your own logic. logic can prove anything as facts are facts but Facts strung together create events. Events are changed by one's perception. Ae strung them together but had no idea what vanity was really so never assumed that it was what he was being. Me had the correct logical assumption but only because his perception led him to that. The facts he used were not the correct string but rather that he saw what he wanted to see with out actually thinking it out. In, this case Me was roight but in others he won't. Me is vain and self concious about it thus he must precieve everyone else as vain in order to justify himself.
Me: I....wow, hmmm....well....
Ae: How do you know when logic is following the correct factual one or one that's self oriented.
Moral: Well.........
Primal: I'am gunna have to cut ye off there. Time for some fun you little bastards. First were gunna talk about Right and wrong....
Ae: That has nothing to do with the conversation...
Primal: SHUTUP YOU STrange ugly little abbomination of the metaphysical. It is your perception that I am going off topic but to me I am roight on topic now shutup and listen. You precieve roight and wrong thru your own thoughts. These thoughts are created from strings of logic that are influenced by thought and emotion. The emotions are primitive logical strands that never change we call these instincts. The logical strands that you create are made from ideas you take in or from things you sense around you. So, perception is all a matter of how you put together facts into logical strands but also what kind of person you are based on how your emotions react to different strands of logic. Logic is the music of life and facts are the notes that tell you how to play. The problem is that we all play different intruments thus creating a chaotic symphonie of philosphies. Of, course I am immposing my ideas upon you thus you cannot take what I say to be direct fact either as I'am influenced as well. Only two things can really be put in the catogory as constants. The first is that perception dictates everything in your own mind. The second is that something is only wrong if you change something with out justification thru your own perception. Violence, greed, and rage can be justfied by a willing mind always. Vanity is a little harder and thus the whieght of the sin is greater. Being vain means you do something for beauty alone without justification or that you try to impose your perception on others. The latter of these two is called self ritousness. It is wrong no matter what as justifying a perception is impossible logically. Asthetics with out purpose is wrong as it is a waste without justification. Anyone who feels the need to change anything for their own enjoyment or even if others agree is being selfish and thus looses justification. In the end the only way to be right is to follow what you precieve to be right and yet never try to impose it on others.
Me:....ok.
Ae: Logic sucks I'am gunna go dance.
Primal: God I hate you guys.
Moral: I'am logical, I say we go read.
Me: I think your being vain.
Ae: I give up........
I impose on you that it is
THE END!!!!!!
Ae: Well I'am chaging my name to Ae.
Me: What changed?
Ae: I'am spelling it with an a and a e.
Me: oh? that's really stupid.
Ae: No it's artistic and interesting. Besides your opinion is corrupt as you are naturally vain and jealous.
Me: Vainity and justices have very little to do with this. you just your name for no phentic reason but rather for a very Vain asthetic one.
Ae: No I changed it for philosphical and artistic reason it is Asthetics with purpose rather then for vain concepts.
Me: Moral help me out plz.
Moral: The truth is really in that your both roight. Me you precieve that Ae's new name is vain as you cannot comprehend his perception. Any asthetic without a philosophic meaning is vainity, this is Me's perception. Ae has the Philosophy thus the justification for his asthetic name change.
Me: So, in order for me to understand Ae's name change he has to explain his reasoning.
Ae:My reasoning is in that it is artistic and I like it.
Moral: Ae you have no justification your being vain. Your reasons are selfish albeit they hurt no one. Me, Ae's reasoning showed that he was vain thus though you were roight you were working off your own logic. logic can prove anything as facts are facts but Facts strung together create events. Events are changed by one's perception. Ae strung them together but had no idea what vanity was really so never assumed that it was what he was being. Me had the correct logical assumption but only because his perception led him to that. The facts he used were not the correct string but rather that he saw what he wanted to see with out actually thinking it out. In, this case Me was roight but in others he won't. Me is vain and self concious about it thus he must precieve everyone else as vain in order to justify himself.
Me: I....wow, hmmm....well....
Ae: How do you know when logic is following the correct factual one or one that's self oriented.
Moral: Well.........
Primal: I'am gunna have to cut ye off there. Time for some fun you little bastards. First were gunna talk about Right and wrong....
Ae: That has nothing to do with the conversation...
Primal: SHUTUP YOU STrange ugly little abbomination of the metaphysical. It is your perception that I am going off topic but to me I am roight on topic now shutup and listen. You precieve roight and wrong thru your own thoughts. These thoughts are created from strings of logic that are influenced by thought and emotion. The emotions are primitive logical strands that never change we call these instincts. The logical strands that you create are made from ideas you take in or from things you sense around you. So, perception is all a matter of how you put together facts into logical strands but also what kind of person you are based on how your emotions react to different strands of logic. Logic is the music of life and facts are the notes that tell you how to play. The problem is that we all play different intruments thus creating a chaotic symphonie of philosphies. Of, course I am immposing my ideas upon you thus you cannot take what I say to be direct fact either as I'am influenced as well. Only two things can really be put in the catogory as constants. The first is that perception dictates everything in your own mind. The second is that something is only wrong if you change something with out justification thru your own perception. Violence, greed, and rage can be justfied by a willing mind always. Vanity is a little harder and thus the whieght of the sin is greater. Being vain means you do something for beauty alone without justification or that you try to impose your perception on others. The latter of these two is called self ritousness. It is wrong no matter what as justifying a perception is impossible logically. Asthetics with out purpose is wrong as it is a waste without justification. Anyone who feels the need to change anything for their own enjoyment or even if others agree is being selfish and thus looses justification. In the end the only way to be right is to follow what you precieve to be right and yet never try to impose it on others.
Me:....ok.
Ae: Logic sucks I'am gunna go dance.
Primal: God I hate you guys.
Moral: I'am logical, I say we go read.
Me: I think your being vain.
Ae: I give up........
I impose on you that it is
THE END!!!!!!