http://www.deutsche-welle.de/dw/article/0,1564,1457216,00.html Fathers' Rights Suffer Setback
13.01.2005
German politicians seeking to outlaw secret paternity tests won a first battle on Wednesday, much to the disappointment of fathers' rights groups
(
Read more... )
Similarly, this would mean that women weren't shocked with a paternity test (that they didn't know about) in court and hence embarassing them in front of other people. WHY? Because they would have to undergo paternity tests meaning cases could be settled without a need for a court (i.e. a settlement) and hence less embarassment for the woman on the whole. Better that she know what evidence will be shown than not to know, and then she knows what risk she's taking by following a case through anyway.. because unlike secret paternity tests, she'll KNOW FOR A FACT that the "Dad" isn't the biological father and hence will also be more prepared.
.. I'm not sure whether I'm making sense but I hope you get what I mean anyway. My basic point is that I can see how unfair it would be to spring secret information of such an emotionally traumatic nature on a woman in court in front of family and friends, but that it's silly to ignore evidence and hence a different approach should be taken. Whew!
Reply
Leave a comment