As promised...

Sep 09, 2008 23:15


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

vespid_interest September 10 2008, 07:18:13 UTC
Part A) You're right that a lot of Theists try to explain the physical world using God or biblical references... but they shouldn't. People who try to take the Bible literally for instance -- I think they're bonkers. What Theists *should* be doing is using "God" as a justification for using a set of social rules to improve humanity/relationships ( ... )

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

bonniebriteeyes September 10 2008, 23:11:46 UTC
I was skimming and read "outcome" as "costume" and had to do a double take.

Reply

cyberbill September 11 2008, 07:07:30 UTC
Did you notice that I used the "dogs bollocks" in my post!? :D

Reply


beckaca September 10 2008, 16:42:02 UTC
Sounds like you wouldn't want to be a politician or a dictator, but a government/political science teacher.

Reply


anonymous September 11 2008, 03:26:01 UTC
You know Atheist's and Theist are pretty much the same. Atheists believe there is no higher being. Theists believe there is. Both believe they know something that they can't possibly know. Agnostic on the other literally means, no special information, meaning no one knows. No one can be sure there is or isn't a god because no one has any special information.

That's just my two cents. :)

Reply

cyberbill September 11 2008, 07:01:32 UTC
Yes, this is very true ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up