Так как всем уже понятно, что деньги и в медицине решают всё, необходимо понять, кто за неё платит, хоть она местами и называется бесплатной
( Read more... )
Тогда да. Я как-то раньше не задумывался, что в самолетах все это должно быть, а ведь это очень логично. А условия в Good Samaritan law довольно простые:
1. Unless a caretaker relationship (such as a parent-child or doctor-patient relationship) exists prior to the illness or injury, or the "Good Samaritan" is responsible for the existence of the illness or injury, no person is required to give aid of any sort to a victim. 2. Any first aid provided must not be in exchange for any reward or financial compensation. As a result; medical professionals are typically not protected by Good Samaritan laws when performing first aid in connection with their employment. 3. If aid begins, the responder must not leave the scene until: * it is necessary to call for needed medical assistance. * somebody of equal or higher ability can take over. * continuing to give aid is unsafe (this can be as simple as a lack of adequate protection against potential diseases, such as vinyl, latex, or nitrile gloves to protect against blood-borne pathogens) - a responder can never be forced to put himself or herself in danger to aid another person. 4. The responder is not legally liable for the death, disfigurement or disability of the victim as long as the responder acted rationally, in good faith, and in accordance with his level of training.
Welcome on board !cialis_viagrychMarch 12 2008, 19:52:01 UTC
Спасибо. Так это ОНО и есть "continuing to give aid is unsafe (this can be as simple as a lack of adequate protection against potential diseases, such as vinyl, latex, or nitrile gloves to protect against blood-borne pathogens) - a responder can never be forced to put himself or herself in danger to aid another person. 4. The responder is not legally liable for the death, disfigurement or disability of the victim as long as the responder acted rationally, in good faith, and in accordance with his level of training." - вот оттуда и испуг...
Re: Welcome on board !mike76March 12 2008, 20:12:12 UTC
Да, понимаю. Я не уверен, что дерматолог или психиатр сможет грамотно полечить отек легкий или острую пароксизмальную тахикардию. И в суд, несмотря на закон, все равно подают.
1. Unless a caretaker relationship (such as a parent-child or doctor-patient relationship) exists prior to the illness or injury, or the "Good Samaritan" is responsible for the existence of the illness or injury, no person is required to give aid of any sort to a victim.
2. Any first aid provided must not be in exchange for any reward or financial compensation. As a result; medical professionals are typically not protected by Good Samaritan laws when performing first aid in connection with their employment.
3. If aid begins, the responder must not leave the scene until:
* it is necessary to call for needed medical assistance.
* somebody of equal or higher ability can take over.
* continuing to give aid is unsafe (this can be as simple as a lack of adequate protection against potential diseases, such as vinyl, latex, or nitrile gloves to protect against blood-borne pathogens) - a responder can never be forced to put himself or herself in danger to aid another person.
4. The responder is not legally liable for the death, disfigurement or disability of the victim as long as the responder acted rationally, in good faith, and in accordance with his level of training.
Reply
Так это ОНО и есть "continuing to give aid is unsafe (this can be as simple as a lack of adequate protection against potential diseases, such as vinyl, latex, or nitrile gloves to protect against blood-borne pathogens) - a responder can never be forced to put himself or herself in danger to aid another person.
4. The responder is not legally liable for the death, disfigurement or disability of the victim as long as the responder acted rationally, in good faith, and in accordance with his level of training." - вот оттуда и испуг...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment