Oct 23, 2004 22:49
We sometimes have baby namings at Shabbat services.
This week we had one (for a family I don't know);
the two mothers and their other two children gathered
on the bima along with the newest addition to the family.
I did not hear anyone say anything about the makeup of
the family, either negative or positive -- it was just
another family. That's refreshing.
The morning torah-study group reached the part in
Numbers where God gives prophecy to the seventy elders
so Moshe won't have to do everything himself (this is
near the end of chapter 11). The text tells us that
in addition to the seventy, there were two men -- Eldad
and Medad -- who also got in on this, though they
didn't join the others at the tent of meeting. Joshua
hears about this and gets upset, apparently because
they're encroaching on Moshe's territory or something.
But since prophecy is clearly something that
is done at God's instigation -- or, at the very least,
with God's cooperation -- how could that be? I don't
see anything in the text to imply that Eldad and Medad
did anything; it's not like they were stow-aways
or something. My read is that they were in the camp
going about their business and -- blam -- they were
prophesying. We didn't get to most of the commentaries
today, so we'll return to this next week.
This probably means we`'re going to also talk about
the people gorging on heaven-sent quail next week,
because that's next in the text. My rabbi pointed out
the coincidental timing with Halloween. :-)
Someone said that the Christian denomination whose
members sometimes "speak in tongues" are basing that
on this. Apparently (and I welcome correction
here!), the idea is that when God talks to you it
transcends language, and you say things that sound like
coherent text to you but gibberish to everyone
else. I'd heard of speaking in tongues before, of course,
but didn't know it was tied to the idea of prophecy.
(I wasn't sure what it was.) I always thought the point
of prophecy was to convey God's words to everyone else
(the prophet is just a vehicle), which would require
doing so in a language your listeners understand. If
this description of speaking in tongues is correct,
that seems to be something that's about the speaker
personally (and God), not about a message to the
community.
Tonight after Shabbat we went to Hunan Kitchen, the
successor (or reincarnation, or something) of Zen Garden
in Squirrel Hill. It's no longer a purely vegetarian
restaurant, but there are still plenty of vegetarian
dishes on the menu. The meal was good except for the
sizzling-beef incident. Someone at another table ordered
something that comes sizzling in a skillet; apparently
something went wrong and the dish emitted a great deal
of smoke only after it got to the table. Everyone in
the place was coughing. It was actually kind of funny,
as the cough migrated outward from ground zero. (We
weren't affected for the first minute or so, but then
we were a little.) I didn't notice what happened to
the dish in all this.
torah,
books,
christianity,
restaurants