The Night Shift

Jan 14, 2010 03:26

On my patrols throughout this city, I have been finding it increasingly necessary to disrupt young vandals from defacing public property.

I understand there is a... countercultural significance to some of this "graffiti," wherein the perpetrators consider themselves artists. Although there are legitimate examples of this - I have seen some quite ( Read more... )

† goliath | n/a

Leave a comment

Comments 25

kingofrejects January 14 2010, 12:59:51 UTC
Depends on the part of town.

Some places, it's an improvement. Others, not so much. Depends on the amount of work involved.

Reply

swornprotector January 14 2010, 21:54:29 UTC
Unfortunately, the law must be unilaterally applied. I would prefer to be able to make exceptions including those criteria.

Reply

kingofrejects January 14 2010, 22:24:06 UTC
Bigger crimes out there.

Reply

swornprotector January 15 2010, 00:01:17 UTC
That is true. But when I cannot find those, I am left with attempting to keep streets unvandalized.

Reply


watsthename January 14 2010, 21:15:59 UTC


NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!

Reply

swornprotector January 14 2010, 21:55:00 UTC
Are you in trouble? What's wrong?

Reply

watsthename January 14 2010, 22:04:25 UTC


Don't paint over it.

Reply

swornprotector January 14 2010, 22:07:06 UTC
Over the graffiti, or over the clean walls?

Reply


hellcommander January 14 2010, 22:21:55 UTC
Depends on where in town it is. Good graffiti doesn't have any place on say... Wall Street, where no one can fucking appreciate it! But in other parts of town, it's a good thing!

Reply

swornprotector January 15 2010, 00:00:35 UTC
Then comes the question of what defines "good graffiti." It is entirely subjective.

Reply

hellcommander January 15 2010, 00:28:20 UTC
I guess my standards would be... uses more than two colors of paint and takes longer than five seconds to spray on, kekek.

Reply

swornprotector January 15 2010, 07:03:19 UTC
A rather broad definition.

Reply


[Private] nyc_detective January 15 2010, 19:35:43 UTC
I dunno, Big Guy, I'm a bit partial to that mural over on [location]. That person had talent, whomever they were.

Reply

[Private] swornprotector January 15 2010, 21:04:18 UTC
Yes. Works of art such as that piece are what prompted me to ask this question. It is still vandalism, is it not, even if it improves the area greatly?

Reply

[Private] nyc_detective January 16 2010, 00:51:52 UTC
Personally, I think that the good ones aren't vandalism so much as free public art.

Reply

[Private] swornprotector January 16 2010, 01:06:50 UTC
Then perhaps we can officially exercise subjective evaluations of these works before administering punishment to these artists.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up