(Untitled)

Jan 01, 2011 23:46

[The following has been both posted to the camp network and printed and pinned to a bulletin board in the mess hall.]Greetings ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 287

(The comment has been removed)

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:00:49 UTC
TT: Glad I could be of service.
TT: I don't suppose you've acquired any information of note on your own?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:06:39 UTC
TT: Have you noticed if there's anyone here who seems to be from your universe, or one like it?
TT: Other than your friends, of course.

Reply


aconsolegod January 2 2011, 08:03:56 UTC
riverNamed: The goal is to find out who killed a man who never really died in the first place.

((OOC: Typed!))

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:07:46 UTC
TT: Is that so?
TT: That sounds inconvenient.
TT: Which man would this be?

Reply

aconsolegod January 2 2011, 08:11:35 UTC
riverNamed: Isn't it?
riverNamed: He goes by the name Stephan Debussey.
riverNamed: He comes by from time to time. Pretty cool guy, actually.

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:19:23 UTC
TT: Really. I'll endeavor to meet him sometime.
TT: Did he not die permanently, or is the whole situation just a mistake, somehow?

Reply


[in person] das_sourkraut January 2 2011, 08:10:25 UTC
Is there a subject that has highest priority for an answer? Each question has rather lengthy answers.

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:16:37 UTC
The goal is my highest priority.
Obviously many of the other points become moot if I can end this.
But I understand that may be a lot to ask.

Reply

das_sourkraut January 2 2011, 08:23:23 UTC
From what I was told, we were gathered as suspects in a "murder." However, it turns out that the so called victim is alive, and the Director will not see reason. So it is in a sense an unreachable goal.

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:27:13 UTC
And you are certain that is not merely a ruse to obscure another motive?

Reply


screwfate January 2 2011, 08:12:53 UTC
*in person*

...I've been here longer than most people. I ought to be able to explain the timeline, generally.

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:22:30 UTC
I would appreciate it. It certainly doesn't appear to be adhering to the timeline laws I'm accustomed to with any faith.

Reply

screwfate January 2 2011, 08:26:42 UTC
The timeline here doesn't adhere faithfully to any laws. If you pay too much attention to it, you'll notice a great deal of strangeness.

The simplest explanation for how it interacts with our own timelines would be to say... in the end you don't miss anything, and no one misses you. Either you're taken from and returned to the same time, or you might periodically find yourself gaining memories of your own world as though you hadn't left. Those are the most common interactions.

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:39:23 UTC
Interesting.
I'm no stranger to oddness about time, but the latter interaction is a new one, in its particulars.
So it's possible that our current selves are merely a projection of sorts, and our normal selves are continuing in their own history as normal, albeit perhaps feeding us memories?
Is there any evidence of the flow going the other way?

Reply


my_pleasure January 2 2011, 08:19:20 UTC
tykiBox [TB] began pestering tentacleTherapist [TT]

TB: what why does it always get my name wrong
TB: how did this thing even get here
TB: nvm you want information huh

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:23:37 UTC
TT: That was my intent, yes.
TT: Do you have information to provide?

Reply

my_pleasure January 2 2011, 08:25:09 UTC
TB: lol of course
TB: but what do i get
TB: if i give it 2 you

Reply

gamebreaker January 2 2011, 08:29:52 UTC
TT: The pleasure of assisting in a public work.
TT: I suppose can also credit you as a contributor in my finished FAQ, if you like.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up