(Untitled)

Oct 11, 2008 14:01

So who has a logical, rational, non-paranormal explanation for something that might be considered out of the ordinary in this camp? Anything. I'm not fussy.

((eta: r-raaaaaaaape i am very very very slow b-bailing. will pick up later.))

Leave a comment

Comments 623

federalparanoia October 11 2008, 03:03:41 UTC
I object.

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:04:55 UTC
On what grounds?

Reply

federalparanoia October 11 2008, 03:05:46 UTC
You're standing on it.

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:14:07 UTC
Ha ha, Mulder.

Reply


iwetmyself October 11 2008, 03:04:56 UTC
What's out of the ordinary?

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:06:17 UTC
*...that is an unfortunate skin condition you have there*

We could start with the creature in the lake, and move on from there.

Reply

iwetmyself October 11 2008, 03:07:33 UTC
Marcy? She's okay, but sometimes she's annoying.

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:31:19 UTC
And there's a perfectly logical explanation for her existence.

Reply


samsera October 11 2008, 03:05:39 UTC
Do you consider God paranormal?

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:07:09 UTC
No. I believe in Him.

Reply

samsera October 11 2008, 03:16:18 UTC
Hmm, after a certain amount of direct interference in the world, his existence is not precisely a matter of faith. The direct intervention of God's data in events is the explanation for many aspects of my world.

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:32:26 UTC
The problem is that I refuse to believe He's responsible for whatever hallucinogens people are being influenced by.

...data?

Reply


overllamatic October 11 2008, 03:05:39 UTC
Fred is a Russian spy satellite.

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:07:39 UTC
Fred?

Reply

overllamatic October 11 2008, 03:09:00 UTC
Fred. [points to the spark of light floating in the air nearby]

Reply

eat_it_hawking October 11 2008, 03:10:09 UTC
I assure you, I am not a spy satellite! He still hasn't even explained what that is properly!

Reply


melonshalfoff October 11 2008, 03:05:42 UTC
Who knows!

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:08:19 UTC
I'll take that as 'no', then.

Reply

melonshalfoff October 11 2008, 03:12:36 UTC
Well ♥ Not yet.

Reply

thewhyincision October 11 2008, 03:33:55 UTC
There has to be one. It's just a matter of finding it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up