Lawd oh Lawd.
I bitch and complain. I do it as if it were a higher duty to humanity. Then id be tying the sacks unto my feet and throwing sticks in every sophists path. IM a fighter. I never claimed to be anything exceeding a sack of homogenized soy product. Those who claim to be anything else, the gentile women, IM speaking of. Name dropping, tight faced
( Read more... )
?
agreed.
Example:
"I found the book witty, unlike the posts from bottomlie"
In your clusterfuck reality you'd piece that sentence as "Bottomlie is witty, she should write a book "(in crayons nonetheless to match the material) Please refrain for the chop shop paraphrasing in the future.
Because I reply means you hold somesort of intrigue? I guess hunters find ducks to be worthy adversaries. You're playing a cliche catch 22 which doesn't exist, much like a viable reason why you replied. Make something tangible, don't play up theology when it was merely used as a medium to cut you down. You do yourself a disservice by pointing out your own all too apparent flaws already.
tah tahtither
p.s(the edit remix calls for one) in the future, prehaps give some forethought to your replies, they have the stench of reaction rather then the aroma of insight. but, prehaps stench is more inline with your character.
Reply
I'm the ape, let's play catch up here for you. Aren't you the one with the knuckles scraping the ground looking, slack jawed, drool cassually collecting along the sides of your mouth for something viable to respond with, hard to throw rocks at omnipotence.
Now, sweetie, if I was hanging on to words to respond to, as you say, then I suppose you latching on to an off the cuff comment about your primitive tendencies is an equal offense. Oh, and what larger argumentative purpose am I supposed to respond to? Hm? If you're looking for a muse, IM booked until December.
that pocketknife really a butterknife sunshine, don't run and hold it at the same time, you may fall and correct God's mistake. World got too child proof for Darwinism,humph.
That looks like a connected thought to me, Johnson. But, I forgive you, let's not dwell on your laggard syntax.
Because I reply means you hold somesort of intrigue? I guess hunters find ducks to be worthy adversaries. You're playing a cliche catch 22 which doesn't exist, much like a viable reason why you replied. Make something tangible, don't play up theology when it was merely used as a medium to cut you down. You do yourself a disservice by pointing out your own all too apparent flaws already.
A hunter and a duck are much different. But I should expect such a diluted, pin in the hay, remark from you ("but I'm sure technicalities may be too specific and there by ruin your abstract medium of replying"). A hunter will pick any duck at whim. Ducks are ducks. Humans are much different, you seek what you think will produce an ample and juicy response. In other words, you wouldn't spark a flame without someone who got your gas going a bit (dear me, almost filthy).
Also, I didn't play up theology as you have mentioned twice thus far. I mocked you, pointing out your 'all to apparent flaws.' 'I was merely using a medium to cut you down,' baby. Speaking of flaws, I did enjoy the initial comment and then the revision after that. You have the old, put on a good face for daddy, complex. I'm not your daddy, but you can take another ride on the compu-fist if you like the abuse.
I say to myself, self, I think he does.
p.s(the edit remix calls for one) in the future, prehaps give some forethought to your replies, they have the stench of reaction rather then the aroma of insight. but, prehaps stench is more inline with your character.
p.s.s. - Your replies aren't exactly the bible of wit and sarcasm, dear. I'd say, hot garbage. But this took a whole five minutes out of my night, there's some potpourri for your little sess pool.
Reply
: That pocketknife really a butterknife sunshine, don't run and hold it at the same time, you may fall and correct God's mistake. World got too child proof for Darwinism,humph:.
That looks like a connected thought to me, Johnson. But, I forgive you, let's not dwell
on your laggard syntax
The period between those two sentences are occur to you, perhaps in the half ass attempt to come off as somehow highbrow, you'd slow down that 2 cylinder mind of yours to pick up on the small stuff. It would avoid so much public disgrace for you in the future. (the second time you went over this, didn't it bitchslap you, the period?"
Muse, I guess that would be an associated term, since you do amuse, on the level of a child holding their fecal matter in hand telling you what they made by themselves.
:pat pat
that
head:
it took more then five minutes out your night, fixation on your level transcends time lines.
Once again rushed, don't even do the me the justice or switching the font when quoting me, or perhaps playing dress up in the shoes of someone who has something worthwild to say does get that clitoris all salutary and erect. Sad that seed
has nothing
to sprout.
booked to December are ya? you've been playing this club all night
pipedreams are nice, the voices in your head, what exactly are their tones, baritones, just curious who could be putting this misinformation about yourself in that hallow little skull of your's.
toddles
Reply
Leave a comment