'Love is...' (something to do with DNA?)

[borntolose]

I have just had a rather interesting, amusing and in some ways infuriating conversation with someone i foolishly believed to be intelligent and opened minded. I am very disappointed in myself. But isnt it frustrating when trying to argue a point with a person who clearly has no arguement or support for there claims? I have enough problems with

Comments

[borntolose]

It is foolish of you to pretend that that is what you did. Who are you trying to convince? I was in the conversation and i know what you said. Arent you strong enough to admit that?
I can accept that you may have realised your error and dont stick by your statements but please dont pretend you didnt make them. Its insulting for you to suggest i would lie for no good reason.

You didnt express a view. Not of any kind. You insisted you knew the truth. I can Paste the conversation to my journal and have it seen by all if you'd like to be reminded. I didnt accuse you of 'knowing everything' or 'being god' i accused you of thinking those things of yourself, which you made quite clear by your remarks... at no point did you say "One head cannot contain all wisdom in the universe" That was a point that i made though not in the asme words. I dont wish to continue to be friends with you when you make me out to be a liar, no.
I am not making a case for execution, i was venting my frustration and feelings. This is my journal and you are well aware that is what i use it for, I have no need to justify myself so if it offends you dont read it.
xxx

[borntolose]

Also you DID infact claim to 'know-it-all' and during the whole conversation there was no evidence of you expressing views but rather insisting that you all you said was fact and truth though completely un-supported. My use of obscenities began before this areguement when you offended me by mocking my friends marriage vows when trying to pass of your opinions of love as fact.