25
The intelligent
win arguments
and lose.
The foolish
lose arguments
and sulk.
The wise
refuse to argue
and gain.
The person close to Tao
does not argue
because she has nothing to say.
--Jos Stabbert.
Also posted to
daily_tao The Tao Is Tao (25) - Daily Tao Something is amiss imoppo
The ignorant are divided from the intelligent,
who are divided from the wise,
who are divided from the people close to Tao.
A dyad tends toward equality,
the benefits of intimacy
must be weight against
the benefits of differential power.
If other factors do not intervene,
intimacy trumps power.
Perhaps the ignorant person
and the sage
will find a relationship that
enlightens the ignorant
and humbles the sage
As in Rumi's Moses and the shepherd
where Moses' criticism
of the shepherds ignorance
caused (with the help of Allah)
a quantum leap in the shepherd's wisdom,
But when we triage or worse
we inevitably create hierarchy and inequality,
two very unTaoist outcomes
If Lao Tse is taken at his word.
Sagacity and wisdom are synonyms.
So why would a Taoist distinguish between them.
Is it because the wise people
of other cultures, religions, philosophies, traditions
are inherently less wise than the Taoist sage?.
That is not why i love philosphical Taoism!