[good plan. He'll ignore it too. And feeling irked that you're agreeing with Mozart :| Not that he'll show that. He's polite as ever]
In Rosenberg's defense, His Majesty did assign him to watch over Mozart's work, as it was a piece commissioned by the Emperor. If he was not critical, the end result could have reflected badly on him. The way he went about stating his opinion was perhaps harsh, but then, I cannot fully support Mozart's treatment of him either.
[Though you are one of his composer BFFs here, Salieri, Mozart is Mozart.]
I am well aware of the fact that Joseph II commissioned several works from Mozart, and the potential repercussions of said works if they were not tasteful, you know. Though Mozart's response was certainly not the best way of going about things, his music does not need to be changed in any way.
Comments 66
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Indeed, that was Mozart. And Mr. Austria as well, though I'm afraid that wasn't near how he normally acts.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'm inclined to agree with Mozart, actually. I believe his music has only as many notes as were necessary.
Reply
In Rosenberg's defense, His Majesty did assign him to watch over Mozart's work, as it was a piece commissioned by the Emperor. If he was not critical, the end result could have reflected badly on him. The way he went about stating his opinion was perhaps harsh, but then, I cannot fully support Mozart's treatment of him either.
Reply
I am well aware of the fact that Joseph II commissioned several works from Mozart, and the potential repercussions of said works if they were not tasteful, you know. Though Mozart's response was certainly not the best way of going about things, his music does not need to be changed in any way.
Reply
I do not personally believe that Mozart's music needed to be changed; his music is well as is.
Reply
That's Mozart?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment