[good plan. He'll ignore it too. And feeling irked that you're agreeing with Mozart :| Not that he'll show that. He's polite as ever]
In Rosenberg's defense, His Majesty did assign him to watch over Mozart's work, as it was a piece commissioned by the Emperor. If he was not critical, the end result could have reflected badly on him. The way he went about stating his opinion was perhaps harsh, but then, I cannot fully support Mozart's treatment of him either.
[Though you are one of his composer BFFs here, Salieri, Mozart is Mozart.]
I am well aware of the fact that Joseph II commissioned several works from Mozart, and the potential repercussions of said works if they were not tasteful, you know. Though Mozart's response was certainly not the best way of going about things, his music does not need to be changed in any way.
Admittedly, at the time I had as much faith in him as Rosenberg. It is difficult to have faith in a young composer who, at first meeting, seems to have more interest in chasing skirts than rehearsing for the premier of his opera.
lmao I had to rewatch it before I repliedbienquifaitmalJanuary 6 2011, 20:57:19 UTC
I'm afraid that, for now, it will have to be the short version, for I have not seen it in several months.
From what I recall, some of the arias were far too close together, creating an odd space at times and, in places, rushing the plot. Alternatively, the addition of an aria occasionally created a pause in the opera that should not have been there. For example, the aria at the beginning of Act 3, if I remember correctly, sung by the lead tenor. Overall, for his first public opera since his dismissal from the Archbishop's service, it was well.
I'm inclined to agree with Mozart, actually. I believe his music has only as many notes as were necessary.
Reply
In Rosenberg's defense, His Majesty did assign him to watch over Mozart's work, as it was a piece commissioned by the Emperor. If he was not critical, the end result could have reflected badly on him. The way he went about stating his opinion was perhaps harsh, but then, I cannot fully support Mozart's treatment of him either.
Reply
I am well aware of the fact that Joseph II commissioned several works from Mozart, and the potential repercussions of said works if they were not tasteful, you know. Though Mozart's response was certainly not the best way of going about things, his music does not need to be changed in any way.
Reply
I do not personally believe that Mozart's music needed to be changed; his music is well as is.
Reply
[HE IS GLAD YOU AGREE, SALIERI, but he won't say that.]
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
From what I recall, some of the arias were far too close together, creating an odd space at times and, in places, rushing the plot. Alternatively, the addition of an aria occasionally created a pause in the opera that should not have been there. For example, the aria at the beginning of Act 3, if I remember correctly, sung by the lead tenor. Overall, for his first public opera since his dismissal from the Archbishop's service, it was well.
Is it a crowning glory? No. But it was well.
Reply
Leave a comment