Blank

Mar 08, 2007 09:02

Blank page.

What to say? So much to say. One problem with our language is that it's sequential, when so much of how I feel is layered and simultaneous.

All at once I want to express the idea that I feel like a spiritual person, that I have this deeply felt sense of some order or prescence to the Universe, that I feel hurt when people talk shit about any kind of religious people or when they talk shit about Faith. Then I want to express that side by side with Faith, I totally get where they are coming from, that when you look at LOGIC their skepticism makes total sense and believing in a 'god' feels brittle and fake.

I feel atheist anger is usually misplaced: they direct it at the practitioners when mostly, I think they are really talking about the fucked up practice of organized religion and how they have and continue to fuck people over. I feel that anger or frustration or derision and I think I get where they are coming from, but try as I may to distance myself from it, the insults hit me like emotional schrapnel and I have to cope or try to make sense of it.

I feel such a disadvantage, in discourse, because agnostics or atheists can articulate their position rationally, but all I have is a lifetime of 'senses' or 'feelings' I can't explain rationally. That's the thing about Faith and Hope: the very concepts are about believing in something even though we cannot rationally explain it. You just FEEL IT and I feel shitty even writing those words because they feel like a cop out. Isn't that an intractable position in rational discourse? "Well, you just don't get how I FEEL." Well, duh, of course. Nobody can argue against a feeling. You can feel like there is a God or that 9/11 was a conspiracy or that there's aliens out there and I can show you all the evidence factual evidence to the contrary and you will still feel that way:

Frustrated... with worlds inside you that, try as you may, you can't get out.

spirit

Previous post Next post
Up