i'm not usually one to start something, but....

Dec 24, 2003 13:15

who the hell does george w. bush think he is? anti-homosexual laws??? when i'm president, i'm going to pass some anti-straight laws. just try and tell me how it's different.

-abortion- gasp. sketchy topic. personally, i don't like them. and i don't think i could ever go through that. however, that is the probelm, isn't it? all i can do is think what i would do in that situation. because i'm not a pregnant woman, and frankly i don't think anyone but a pregnant woman, or a woman who has before been pregnant has the authority in such a decision. the problem is bush is a man, and he just doesn't and can't know what would be going on in the mind of someone getting an abortion. what if she was raped? how could you tell her she is now unable to decide wether or not she is going to give birth-- one of the most agonizing experiences (for the entire nine months) that any human knows?

-freedom of speech- did you know we are actually forbidden to speak against the president? last i heard we were. frankly, what's the point? he doesn't want anyone making fun of him or something? he's the freaking president. someone's going to hate him. i mean, what's a president worth if half the country can't praise him and the other half bitch about his existance as a human being? that is by definition a president. freedom of speech IS NOT TREASON. i do not hate america by saying i disagree with the values of the president. he isn't america, he just runs it for a few years.

-anti-homosexuality- i'm sorry. who made you god? i realize that you can not change it so homosexuals can get married wherever they want. frankly, that's up to the church they are in. that is-- if you belong to that church. there are some that completely accept homosexuality. i would know. we're methodist. we love everyone. and what about agnostics? don't they get married? and how will that adversely affect the country. hmm- so far it hasn't. so what's the big deal if those two people happen to be of the same gender? oh no. some people won't like it. well, i don't like fried apples-- please outlaw those as well.

and wait. anti-sodomy laws? 1) is it really any of your business and 2) how were you planning on enforcing that? that is, without invading the right to privacy, which is exactly what the law did anyway.

-the way i see it- we built this country with a separation of church and state. didn't we all move here because someone was forcing religion on us? and how is it different if we make religion law? i'm sorry, jews, but you now must believe that jesus was the messiah because the president does. and all you pagans, we are now deporting you. though you live lives of peace and have strong and good values as part of the wiccan religion, the president thinks you worship satan. nevermind that you don't even believe in satan. satan has horns and so does your god. we're also deporting goats, male sheep, cows, bulls, and fans of the bulls.

all moral issues aside, anti-homosexuality is political suicide. i've been saying that for forever, and only recently have i been backed up by real power. what power you may ask? well, even if you don't ask i'm telling you. the media. the single most powerful thing in this country. for those vh1 fans out there, you may have seen totally gay. yes, some of it was about celebrities, but it was mostly spitting out politics. and it all makes sense. the estimated gay market is $45 billion. you can go ahead and say that's $45 billiion+ against bush with all the people he's pissing off. you must admit that's a hefty sum. in the media, homosexuality is quickly becoming regular. show me a network that produces no shows with at least one homosexual character, and i'll show you a network with low ratings. i'm not saying he's not allowed to hate homosexuals anymore. i'm just saying it's a bad career move.

the best thing that happened to this country in these past few years was bill clinton-- the first president in forever to not fear the word "homosexual". more importantly, he wasn't afraid to talk about AIDS. you want the blunt, scientific answer to why most AIDS patients are homosexuals? less homosexuals use condoms. why you may ask? well, there's a very low pregnancy risk. :) that's sarcasm there. there's actually a 0% pregnancy risk between two people of the same gender. unless you're a worm or frog. biology. word. yes, yes, yes. clinton got himself into some pretty big trouble. but does that cancel out the good he's done? jfk said that the fall of greece was due to it's rampant homosexuality. oh wow, i wasn't aware. and here i've been thinking all this time that the roman army was actually the cause. stupid history textbook. spreading filthy lies. jfk would definately know better than historians. definately.
Previous post Next post
Up