(no subject)
nope. last november was apparently all sunshine and farts for me. the added distraction of jim having just arrived, as well was ray and katy, helped. i guess i'm not as exactly cyclical as i thought.
what i AM, is poor. with no healthcare. i'm not even elligible for medicaid as far as i know, but this bill STILL worries me.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10233176/page/2/
i like the stopping rich bastards from being selfish leeches unnecessarily, but i kind of get the feeling that when your country stops caring about it's pregnant women and children (IE: IT'S FUTURE) it doesn't have much more to look forward to.
it's a tight position, but i can't help but wonder if the saved 2.5billion out of some trillion dollars will make as big a difference as that?
all i have to say is, the predictions are right. the poor will not seek healthcare. instead we will wait until it kills us, because we can't afford to live and pay for the medical costs anyway. and now they can refuse to give them to us if we can't pay. lovely.
on the rich/priveleged/those young enuf to be under a lucky parents insurance/those lucky enuf to find an insured job get to be healthy.
lets just call it darwin, eh? the rich are the only ones who should survive anyway
*bitter bitter bitter*
i don't care what anyone says, universal healthcare is better than no healthcare. i know people in canada come here for our specialists, but i would willingly lie cheat and steal to get into canada and be able to have a checkup.
why can't we have basic universal care, with our standard system of healthcare for anything above the call of duty. then we'll still have specialists, but can supply basic healthcare to all.
i suppose this was the idea of medicaid, it just got all mussed up.
also, is it really a good idea to let hillary run? i think it's too early.....
and who the hell does this southern governer think he is? can't everyone see he's a republican in democrats clothing!?
oye.
*must not expatriate. must not expatriate*
what i AM, is poor. with no healthcare. i'm not even elligible for medicaid as far as i know, but this bill STILL worries me.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10233176/page/2/
i like the stopping rich bastards from being selfish leeches unnecessarily, but i kind of get the feeling that when your country stops caring about it's pregnant women and children (IE: IT'S FUTURE) it doesn't have much more to look forward to.
it's a tight position, but i can't help but wonder if the saved 2.5billion out of some trillion dollars will make as big a difference as that?
all i have to say is, the predictions are right. the poor will not seek healthcare. instead we will wait until it kills us, because we can't afford to live and pay for the medical costs anyway. and now they can refuse to give them to us if we can't pay. lovely.
on the rich/priveleged/those young enuf to be under a lucky parents insurance/those lucky enuf to find an insured job get to be healthy.
lets just call it darwin, eh? the rich are the only ones who should survive anyway
*bitter bitter bitter*
i don't care what anyone says, universal healthcare is better than no healthcare. i know people in canada come here for our specialists, but i would willingly lie cheat and steal to get into canada and be able to have a checkup.
why can't we have basic universal care, with our standard system of healthcare for anything above the call of duty. then we'll still have specialists, but can supply basic healthcare to all.
i suppose this was the idea of medicaid, it just got all mussed up.
also, is it really a good idea to let hillary run? i think it's too early.....
and who the hell does this southern governer think he is? can't everyone see he's a republican in democrats clothing!?
oye.
*must not expatriate. must not expatriate*