*sighs*
So like seriously. . .still at conference.
Last year I openly stated that albedo fits of asteroids with data from a certain camera had errors of order 45% and someone else had an extreme of butthurt and I was informed via the gossip mill (he complained to his postdoc who he told not to speak to me, so instead that postdoc said something to my collaborator and thus a oneway game of telephone was played).
So this last year they enrolled the expert to tell me I was full crap. His result? That the albedos have errors on the order of ~50%.
I'm so glad I'm just a dumb graduate student who just doesn't know what she's saying and can't get a job. [/sarcasm]
Last year I openly stated that albedo fits of asteroids with data from a certain camera had errors of order 45% and someone else had an extreme of butthurt and I was informed via the gossip mill (he complained to his postdoc who he told not to speak to me, so instead that postdoc said something to my collaborator and thus a oneway game of telephone was played).
So this last year they enrolled the expert to tell me I was full crap. His result? That the albedos have errors on the order of ~50%.
I'm so glad I'm just a dumb graduate student who just doesn't know what she's saying and can't get a job. [/sarcasm]