Comments | astolat: Catch Me If You Can

astolat

Catch Me If You Can

Jan 05, 2003 01:09

Verdict: brilliantly crafted movie, and very much NOT for anyone with an embarrassment/mortification squick. If you don't know what that is, you don't have it, so go see the movie. Me? I was only prevented from fleeing because we were there with friends. But if you do have the squick, I recommend lying in wait for the DVD and fast-forwarding ( Read more... )

Comments 7

jacquez January 4 2003, 22:36:07 UTC

thank you for the warning. i was planning to see it tomorrow.

now i am NOT.

gah.

astolat January 5 2003, 08:29:24 UTC

Happy to help. Usually I can guess from the advertising and avoid, but this one didn't sound like something that would get me, and it did. :P

spike21 January 4 2003, 23:10:22 UTC

eeeeeeek! I had my suspicions about this. thanks. Heh -- it should be an official rating category.

astolat January 5 2003, 08:30:04 UTC

Absolutely. But then at least half of what's on TV would have to go under that category too. :P

thete1 January 4 2003, 23:19:25 UTC

Dude, Gimli is *way* more slashable than Tom Hanks.

Er... so long as I forget who's under the makeup and beard. *koff*

astolat January 5 2003, 08:32:13 UTC

But Tom Hanks has those bulgy black-rim glasses, and the thick lips, and that slightly creepy smirk, and...

butterfly January 7 2003, 00:41:38 UTC

So, if you can't watch Him because of the embarrassment factor, avoid CMIYC?