by Mansfield Frazier
The Daily Beast Who knows how the former Bradley Manning will fare at Fort Leavenworth? When I was locked up, I didn’t see transgender inmates treated badly. Some were royalty.
The most bloodcurdling sound I’ve ever heard came from the throat of a prisoner as a 10-gallon vat of boiling-hot cooking oil was dumped on his head in the chow hall at Kentucky’s Ashland federal prison. The man-a huge, strapping bodybuilder-had slapped a small, effeminate gay inmate two days prior for laughing at him as he busted out of a poker game.
Bradley Manning, the soldier convicted of giving classified state documents to WikiLeaks, is pictured dressed as a woman in this 2010 photograph obtained on August 14, 2013. (Handout / Reuters)
The bodybuilding bully was carried out on a stretcher, never again seen on the compound, and the gay man who meted out the prison justice got the minimum amount of time allowable (two years) tacked onto his already long sentence. No one ever slapped him again, at least that I’m aware of.
The question of how
Chelsea Manning (formerly Bradley Manning) will fare in a male prison now that the WikiLeaks informant has come out as a transgender individual is impossible to answer with any degree of certainty. It could be terrible. But based on my personal experience serving time in federal prisons-and in contrast with the horrible images of repeated sexual assault that many have no doubt conjured up already-transgender and gay inmates are often treated quite well.
To be sure, many transgender inmates face a daunting life behind bars. A
2012 report from the Department of Justice found that more than a third of transgender former inmates were sexually assaulted in prison. The same report found that transgender woman are 13 times more likely to be assaulted than other inmates. (The Department of Justice does not oversee military prisons such as Fort Leavenworth, where Manning will serve his sentence. Such statistics for military prisons aren’t available; the scourge of male rape in the military itself
is well documented.)
One person’s prison is another person’s palace.
But life in prison is more complex than many statistics suggest. When I was in the joint, rape wasn’t just something you could let happen to you. In fact, you’d better get another set of eyes in the back of your head if you want to force yourself on someone and make them an unwilling participant in a sex act. You see, the victim can slip up behind you on any given day and stick a shank in your ribs-or pay someone else to do it. And this potential for retribution serves as the best deterrent against unwanted sexual advances, and keeps the general order in prisons as well.
Indeed, the vast majority of experienced convicts know that “true” rape is not a common occurrence in prison. That doesn’t mean that homosexual sex doesn’t occur-it certainly does. But it’s really not that unusual for a new prisoner to show up on the compound and begin walking around the yard in pants far too tight. Before long they drop the soap in the shower, get a little close to another naked man, and then- simply because they’ve never been able to come to terms with their own sexuality-tell anyone who will listen (but, interestingly enough, they usually never complain to the guards) that they were “raped.” And a week or two later it could happen again, and then again.
Quiet as it’s kept, this is one reason for high recidivism rates. In prison, closeted homosexuals can receive what they desire but are able to maintain to the world they really find such behavior disgusting; in this manner they don’t have to take responsibility for what happened to them.
But there are other scenarios.
From what I witnessed, it was quite common for a transgender inmate to get “married” behind bars. And her “husband” would, in all probability, be that big, dreaded prison dude known as “Bubba.” And Bubba wouldn’t have to say a word to the other prisoners in regards to keeping their grimy mitts off his “wife.”
Others took up prostitution. In those cases, Bubba would become a pimp, and both of them would be “prison rich” as the johns line up outside her cell to pay for her sexual favors. As Bob Seger once sang-and it’s doubly true in prison-“they got the fire down below.”
Another option, although highly unlikely, is that the feds will allow Manning to have sexual-reassignment surgery performed (which she may or may not desire), and in that case she could be transferred to a woman’s prison. But this scenario is truly a long shot.
One thing is almost a certainty: celibacy probably won’t be an option for Chelsea Manning, but she will have choices in regard to how she wants to spend her years behind bars. With that said, we need to keep in mind that one person’s prison is another person’s palace. Chelsea Manning could become the queen bee.