You know how it is when you haven't posted for so long that when you start to post there's just too many things to say, and you give up and don't post? That's been happening to me. But I'm going to give it a shot, in traditional sad face/happy face format:
:( I missed the WOMBATs. I took the test, but I didn't get a code, and right when I went back to try again, she locked the door. The witch! I'll be very jealous of all you with certificates.
:) My Scribbulus essay is
posted. It was an illuminating experience being "edited" for the first time. Usually I just slap my stuff up as soon as I finish, or sometimes I get great suggestions from people like
acemyth or
peachespig. But this is the first time I've ever had someone take my essay apart and tell me "now, put it back together and make it better." It was an great experience, so thanks, SeverineSnape! Oh, and because I'm a shameless comment ho, here's my introduction:
Harry Potter readers have been given a wealth of information in supplemental books, interviews with J.K. Rowling, and posts on Rowling’s official website: information we use to help in our understanding of the books and the world Rowling has created and to try to solve mysteries in the books’ plots, and much information that we enjoy simply for its own sake. According to currently dominant literary theory, however, "the author is dead," and we ought not to be listening to a writer talk about her own books, much less letting her influence how we read and understand those books. Will J.K. Rowling’s communications to us outside of her books have a lasting effect on the interpretation and estimation of her works, or will her words have no long-term impact, as modern literary theory demands and predicts? That battle is being fought right now, and we - all of us - are in the thick of it.
I'd be interested to know what you guys think
of it. ;)
:( I've been working on Entertainment Books some more.
:) The other Scribbulus essays this month are AWESOME. Let me pimp them to you!
Character love essays:
Neville by SeverineSnape and
Book 5 Harry by Areya Simmons.
Canon speculation: Clever theories about
Treacle and
Snape as a Machiavellian "prince" by BKluttz and Andrew Cooper, respectively.
Muggle studies: A
comparison between the joys of HP and the still-unsampled-by-me wonders of Veronica Mars by
connielane, and an
exploration of Muggle education seen through the lens of Hogwarts by Ricki Lee Silverman.
Canon analysis: An
examination of how the four houses functionally serve wizarding society by
wahlee_98, a
solution to the problem of how Hermione can hate Divination and love Arithmancy by Witherwings, and
a subtle look at the morality of the Unforgivable Curses by Theowyn.
Read! Enjoy! Comment! And if you don't want to comment at TLC, feel free to comment on these essays here because getting comments on essays someone else did the work of writing is for the win.
:( Five weeks with no House and the Astros aren't even in the playoffs.
:) Two Very Important Books are coming out soon. The thirteenth and LAST Series of Unfortunate Events will be out on October 13 and Lois Bujold's new fantasy (and first half of a duology),
The Sharing Knife, Vol. 1 will be out on October 10 (OMG five more days!!!). For those of you who want something to read and inexplicably don't want to read Scribbulus essays, try the first two chapters of it
here!