Want the proof that 9/11 was an inside job?

[alephomega]

Do you think it's possible our government could have aided, or even carried out the attacks of September 11th? Do you think that any suggestion of such a thing is ridiculous "conspiracy theory?" If so, I welcome you to read on, and even more, feel free to question me or raise any doubts you might have, or evidence you've found which contradicts

Comments

[ex_themothe]

Not disagreeing, just pointing out a few things. While I'm not convinced the government carried the attacks out, I'm fairly sure they wouldn't have stopped them if they knew what was coming.

One thing I've never read on any of the sites about how 9/11 was an "inside" job was how often the military runs these "war games". I think that would be a pretty important factor. If they run them once a week, or even once a month, it would make it a little less important.

For the simple fact that due to the drills taking place that day, if the 9/11 attacks had occured on ANY DAY OTHER THAN SEPTEMBER 11th 2001, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for them to succeed.

Easy for us to say NOW, after the attacks had occured. Until 9/11, every hijacking of an airliner consisted of some arabs taking a plane to some airport and holding the people hostage on the tarmac until they got what they wanted. If the government wasn't behind the attacks, and they knew they were going on, the odds of them scrambling fighters to attack the planes would be pretty low, since that would result in the death of hundreds of civilians. When three planes crashed into buildings within a few minutes of each other, then they might have scrambled the fighters to shoot down flight 93 before it reached DC.

[alephomega]

"Easy for us to say NOW, after the attacks had occured. Until 9/11, every hijacking of an airliner consisted of some arabs taking a plane to some airport and holding the people hostage on the tarmac until they got what they wanted."

The government was aware of the possibility of using planes as weapons well before 9/11. They even prepared and ran drills for this exact contingency at the pentagon in 2000. That's why I say... one piece of evidence, sure, it can go either way, but when you stack everything together, it paints a fairly obvious picture. Reference either of the two documentaries I link to. Loose Change is probably a little bit better for this, as it deals soley with 9/11, and spells everything out in a pretty no-nonsense format.

[alephomega]

Keep in mind, I'm not saying everything in the documentary is 100% accurate, there's still a lot of weird shit and inconsistencies that could be argued. However there's still so much evidence pointing towards the conclusion that the government was involved that some minor quibbling over minor details here and there doesn't really overshadow the obvious conclusion, in my mind.

Still, as always use your own discretion, but at the same time, make sure you've watched some of this stuff and done a little research before you make claims that it's a "wild" conspiracy theory (not saying you are, but I've seen that a lot - apparent "experts" who are really just shooting off at the mouth).