(no subject)

[abexy]

I think I have a tendency in, when I try to explain things, I say it in such a way which makes it incredibly unclear. I use double negatives and leave out necessary words, or necessary ideas and the flows of thinking all together. So, let me restate my last limerence post. I was not, not, grossly broadening the definition of limerence. I was stating limerence is not a unique feeling, it is simply a specific one in the spectrum of desires. I was observing other desires, specifically those directed at other social interactions, had similarities. That's not limerence. That's a desire for friendship. Or, if you prefer, a desire for zombie sieges. Or perhaps you get a limerent like feeling from and enjoyable activity, like coding. Well, the similarity is from the fulfillment of a desire, or enjoyment of an activity. Point: nothing in limerence is unique to limerence. It's a specific collection of other emotions toward a goal.

I'm done now.