Harry tells Ron and Hermione about the horcruxes during charms. Ron is so astounded that he makes it snow which leads to the first time JKR uses a non-aggressive adverb in describing Hermione talking to Ron. SCORE! Of course, Lavender can tell that Hermione is talking "patiently" instead of snapping, berating, or otherwise belittling Ron and she
(
Read more... )
"Ron looked immensely guilty and turned his back on her." -- Emphasis mine. I never really sympathized with Lavender before this moment when Ron is acting like an utter cad. Doesn't help that Ron was terrible to her the whole book. Argh, sorry, this whole scene sums up why I dislike the treatment of romance in this book. Everyone is just so petty and caught up with what they want, never mind who else might get hurt ( ... )
Reply
So glad to hear you say that, because I really felt for poor Lavender here. Ron misuses her and treats her badly and he then doesn't even have to feel guilty for dumping her, because for one brief moment she comes to her senses and dumps him (but then she goes back to being a lovesick puppy.)
Did anyone actually care about Quidditch in this book? I've actually enjoyed it a lot in the past, but it seemed like the book itself didn't care this time around.
I've never much cared for it actually, but JKR's heart was definitely not in it this time around, because when she wants to she can create exciting sports scenes. I'm still trying to figure out how Gryffindor lost to Hufflepuff by about 300 points, but is still ahead of them in the standings, but "maths" as they say.
Do you think a Horcrux might be hidden ( ... )
Reply
Yes, another lovely kick in the gut from The Interview was hearing Jo say that Quidditch has been the bane of her life in the Harry Potter books. Very nice.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I've always had a secret soft spot for the characters that JKR derides and pushes aside, like Lavender and Parvati (and Fleur and Zacharias), when we don't every really know them. It really annoys me that the characters can treat others so badly and get away with it because, "they were shallow anyway."
speculation centers on the tiara as a possible Ravenclaw item ...
Hmm. I suppose that's as good as anything. I don't really want Ravenclaw's item to be coded so obviously female, though.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I'd probably be upset if my brother was engaged to a silly, elitist, narcissist too -- but we've known since GoF that Fleur isn't so shallow. She's a very competent, brave witch who cares deeply about her family. So, I don't know why it seemed like JKR thought we had forgotten about the second part.
Reply
Nice! I never thought there was a problem, though; because (a) I didn't see any problem with an Imperius spell being transitive in its application, and (b) I'd assumed that the person casting the Imperius on Rosemerta likewise cast it on Katie, once she was manoeuvred into the right spot. In any case, no 'crazy feedback', since there's no cycle or loop in the chain of spells - Katie wasn't casting Imperius in turn.
Did anyone actually care about Quidditch in this book?
No. I felt I was supposed to, but did not. Anticlimatic, really, how Harry was knocked out of one match and wasn't present for the final. But it served to grant Ginny her "hard, blazing look" which attracted Harry (and his monster) so at the right time.
Ah, Sectumsempra. Now that's a curse. Is it a sign of Snape's loyalty to the Order that the DEs at the ( ... )
Reply
Oh, by the time we found out about Rosemerta I'd forgotten about Katie actually being under Imperius herself, so I just assumed it was all by Draco. Looking at it here, it seems like it was probably Rosemerta. Which is . . . odd, since you usually don't suppose mind-controlled zombies retain declarative knowledge. Although, I suppose we could get into a deeply nerdy conversation about whether spell casting is declarative knowledge or procedural knowledge, when you take into consideration that silent casting seems to rely on the cast channeling the emotions and power necessary for the spell without thinking about it very much.
The whole thing seemed a bit contrived to me, Harry could have used oodles of other spells I would have thought.Harry's use of the spell is kinda interesting to me. It seems to be reflecting his arc of darkening through the series. He wants to kill Sirius in PoA, he ( ... )
Reply
EXACTLY!!!! Thanks, great to read someone summarising my feelings so much better!
Crabbe and Goyle show a lot of loyalty and devotion to Draco, far more than Ron and Hermione display in this book.
Ah, but Crabbe and Goyle are unthinking zombies, just slavishly following Draco around, not *actively* trying to go out of their way to help him at all. Whereas Hermione and Ron have always helped Harry, they've *partcipated* in assisting him to solve all his problems, they've .... hold on ... oh. HBP. Right. Sorry.
You have the right of it after all.
Sigh.
Reply
I think these things really have to be judged within a similar context. Crabbe and Goyle's loyalty was significant throughout the year in which Draco was suffering his emotional/personality crisis. But as was Ron and Hermione's during the year in which Harry was suffering his. Whereas they are currently having more problems (um, if romantic problems are to be taken seriously) during this year, the situation turns so that it's his loyalty to them that's significant.
When Draco is injured, Pansy flees to his side. Hermione didn't do that for either boyHarry in PoA (where she cried when he fell off his broom, and both she and Ron spent the entire weekend with him in the hospital wing) and Ron in HBP ( ... )
Reply
True, but I'm not so much trying to demonstrate the moral superiority of the Slytherin kids as the equability. It probably is overstating it to say that Draco's friends are more loyal than Harry's. I do think they are no less loyal, though.
Of course, the threat of death to yourself and your whole family hanging over certainly influences any final choices you will have to make, but Ginny didn't even have this choice.Actually, we don't know for sure that she didn't have a choice. CoS never adequately explains why Ginny stole the diary back from Harry. Riddle says that Ginny stole it back because she was afraid that Riddle was going to spill all of her secrets to Harry. Unfortunately, he's an unreliable narrator. On the other hand, Riddle gladly takes credit to everything else terrible he's done, and seems genuinely annoyed ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment