HBP 20: Lord Voldemort's Request

Sep 05, 2005 09:42

Mod Note: We've had a mix up in the summaries so we'll be playing catch-up over the next couple of entries. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Chapter 20 Cliff's Notes Version:
  1. Ron and Harry get to leave the hospital wing escorted by Hermione.
  2. Luna hands out notes from Dumbledore and Gurdyroots which amuses Ron.
  3. Hermione looks over finishes Harry's ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

house_elf_44 September 5 2005, 20:06:53 UTC
If this is what it takes for Ron and Hermione to let go of their feud, I don't want to see them end up together. It seemed odd that Hermione would tell them Ginny and Dean argued. Breaking up I could see. I don't like that creature in Harry's chest, and really wish Jo wrote this differently if it isn't from love potion ( ... )

Reply

cadesama September 5 2005, 21:20:48 UTC
In the second memory, are Voldemort's features distorted from tearing his soul many times, or is it from something else he experimented with? Why aren't Death Eaters and Aurors faces distorted, too?

I think it's some other spells he's been experimenting with aside from the Horcruxes -- although even if it's the Horcruxes, that's still quite different from the type of killing the DEs do (Aurors only had permission to kill under Crouch Sr.). We don't know what happens to the soul after it tears if you don't make a Horcrux, but it makes sense to me that the bit of soul stayed tenuously attached rather than disappearing or going adrift. Of course, a physical transformation due to having split your soul, seems to imply a person having less soul, which in turn implies the soul being finite in the first place. Which is weird to me.

Reply

woman_ironing September 5 2005, 23:21:39 UTC
I don't like that creature in Harry's chest, and really wish Jo wrote this differently if it isn't from love potion.

I agree! It makes me cringe with embarassment whenever I read it. Is it supposed to be some sort of metaphor for sexuality because Harry can't quite bring himself to examine his feelings for Ginny too closely? Or is it some macho male thing that, being female, I don't understand? It just doesn't adequately express whatever it is that Harry is feeling, not like JKR's handling of the Mirror of Erised in PS or Sirius in PoA etc.

Reply

house_elf_44 September 6 2005, 00:41:29 UTC
To me, this is a perfect example of Jo's writing being "Emma meets Alchemy".

The monster goes with a description for the Chemical Wedding, which the first time is rather beastly, and refines to a higher level on each cycle through the steps, ending with "divine love essence".

It's no secret I like the love potion theories, so the effect of LP is a good excuse for Harry to have beastly feelings that wouldn't normally be his, and don't look like true love. That also would produce a twist.

This is my third read through, and I have not hit anything that makes this impossible. The anvils can all be interpreted at least two ways.

Reply

rainfletcher September 6 2005, 14:03:04 UTC
Considering how much of the other symbolism has been shot down, I'm reluctant to consider an alchemy theme. Though I believe a chapter or three back you mentioned that JKR had hinted that the alchemy symbolism might have some legitimacy after all -- by any chance could you direct me to where this was said?

If not, could you summarize a bit?

I'd be ever so grateful.

Reply

Jo and Alchemy house_elf_44 September 6 2005, 18:10:39 UTC
Things that point to Jo using alchemy, would include ( ... )

Reply

Re: Jo and Alchemy rainfletcher September 7 2005, 08:26:54 UTC
Thank you! Fascinating stuff all around.

Reply

cadesama September 6 2005, 04:10:44 UTC
::shrugs:: Seems like a straight forward penis metaphor to me.

Reply

Replies then rambles woman_ironing September 6 2005, 08:34:33 UTC
Yes, lol. But in his chest?! And it's so coy. I suppose it shows that these feelings are outside Harry's control, but then just about everything in his life/the story is outside his control. It also makes the feelings seem outside him. Hence the love-potion theory, mirroring Merope and Tom senior. But is it credible that Ginny is so manipulative as to potion Harry while still going out with Dean?

Reply

Re: Replies then rambles house_elf_44 September 6 2005, 18:34:38 UTC
But is it credible that Ginny is so manipulative as to potion Harry while still going out with Dean?

I think it's possible considering the various things she's done over the years.

And there are at least 3 versions of the love potion theory out there: Ginny doing it on purpose, Ginny unknowingly using love potion in a perfume bottle, and Hermione did it somehow to match make. I can see all three scenarios working, and haven't truly decided which one is my favorite. But I think the "unknowingly" version is the one Jo would be most likely to use, and would produce the most suspense in book 7, making us wonder if Harry will still like Ginny without love potion.

Going with the belief that these books have no room for extraneous information, I think the twin's shop having a new clerk named Verity (truth) is because she's going to reveal that Ginny is using love potion. She also provides a way for Ginny (or Hermione) to buy WWW love potion products without Fred and George knowing.

Reply

Re: Replies then rambles seicat September 6 2005, 18:41:19 UTC
Another possibility someone brought up was the "unusual perfume" Ron gave Hermione for Christmas. Amortentia would be "unusual" if someone thought it was a perfume. Also, we know Fred and George kept extra stocks and unfinished products in their old rooms. What if Ron went looking in there for a present. Or, even worse, the twins used him as a guinea pig.

Reply

Re: Replies then rambles house_elf_44 September 6 2005, 19:26:35 UTC
Yeah, Ron's gift going from Hermione to Ginny is part of the "unknowingly" theory, with either Ron nicking it from the twin's stock, or the twins giving it to him as a joke. I could see Hermione giving it to Ginny while encouraging her to move on and date other boys. I guess Ginny could have picked up a bottle around the house, too.

Hermione says the twins sell a dozen kinds of love potions. I don't think Ginny is wearing Amortentia, or Harry would be smelling treacle tart and a broomstick handle, too, or whatever his 3 favorite things are at the time. Hm, does it always make you smell 3 things? I think she's wearing a weaker and therefore, more subtle love potion, and it's made her popular with the boys.

Reply

annearchy September 6 2005, 20:13:58 UTC
The "unusual perfume" is my personal favorite possibility. It would be an unwitting way for several people to be affected by a relatively weak love potion (compared to Amortentia). I got the feeling that Hermione did not like the scent of the perfume Ron gave her in OotP, but was trying not to hurt his feelings and so didn't tell him that directly, so she just described it as "unusual". This would also (IMO) make an interesting tie back to OotP; we now know that the Vanishing Cabinet stuff in OotP was not a throwaway, but became a major plot point in HBP. Wouldn't it be interesting if the "unusual perfume" turned out to be a plot point...but of course now we won't find out until Book 7.

Reply

Re: Replies then rambles cadesama September 6 2005, 19:11:47 UTC
It also makes the feelings seem outside him.

Very true, but that's arguably in character for Harry. Much of his anger in OotP is described in a fairly detached way, which led to theories that most of the anger was actually bleed through from Voldemort. Harry is simply deeply unintrospective, in my opinion, and I think that's what leads to him somatizing most of his emotions and/or acting as though they are from an outside source.

Given that Ginny admits that dating other boys when she hadn't given up on Harry was pretty much a ploy to attract his attention? I think it's credible for the character to slip Harry a love potion while dating someone else. I don't really think it's a credible plot twist, though.

Reply

annearchy September 6 2005, 16:58:34 UTC
And JKR was too timid to write anything about REAL sexuality... so she elevated the monster's location in Harry's body. Monster = trouser snake. Well, she couldn't possibly write that in a "children's book", could she?? ;) Though honestly, aren't there a lot of 11- and 12-year-old boys reading these books? I suppose they could be sniggering about this too.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up