(no subject)
the girl i can share my alienation with.
society doesn't want those who question it, society has no time for thinkers.
society is a machine, drilling away, pumping out. it's all about the bottom lines, and meeting quotas for setting standards in social status quo.
she is equally as disconnected from the machine as i am,
she doesn't belong, nor has any intent to.
this is not said in the manner of;
"yeah, thats right mother fucker,
i dont need that machine. anarchy, anarchy!"
nor is it said in the manner of being ABOVE
or BELOW the machine. just simply being isolated from it.
you see once you BEGIN to isolate yourself from it,
you no longer meet the social requirement of its subjects: being unquestioning.
that's why there is an immediate action, reaction, and counter reaction that leads
to complete and utter isolation.
who is to say whether this is a good thing or not.
status quo tells us that living in the bubble,
is the only proper way of living, all other methods
would be a waste, or a shame.
but what is existance truly? how can there be
a waste? for there to be a waste, that would mean
there was a certain expectation or correct answer in which
was not met efficiently?
of course, no one can set such a standard as it's obviously the most subjective
value possible for a human to hold.
so the question is:
"is it possible to exist incorrectly or even wastefully,
when there is no specific existance to be existed?", i suppose
well, the point is; she has wondered this too, at some point.
society doesn't want those who question it, society has no time for thinkers.
society is a machine, drilling away, pumping out. it's all about the bottom lines, and meeting quotas for setting standards in social status quo.
she is equally as disconnected from the machine as i am,
she doesn't belong, nor has any intent to.
this is not said in the manner of;
"yeah, thats right mother fucker,
i dont need that machine. anarchy, anarchy!"
nor is it said in the manner of being ABOVE
or BELOW the machine. just simply being isolated from it.
you see once you BEGIN to isolate yourself from it,
you no longer meet the social requirement of its subjects: being unquestioning.
that's why there is an immediate action, reaction, and counter reaction that leads
to complete and utter isolation.
who is to say whether this is a good thing or not.
status quo tells us that living in the bubble,
is the only proper way of living, all other methods
would be a waste, or a shame.
but what is existance truly? how can there be
a waste? for there to be a waste, that would mean
there was a certain expectation or correct answer in which
was not met efficiently?
of course, no one can set such a standard as it's obviously the most subjective
value possible for a human to hold.
so the question is:
"is it possible to exist incorrectly or even wastefully,
when there is no specific existance to be existed?", i suppose
well, the point is; she has wondered this too, at some point.