Looks like the green's weren't successful in the lower house, with the exception of Melbourne, which is too close to call (at one point Pike was ahead on 50.2%, then a little later she's behind on 49.6
( Read more... )
Potentially 1-4 green seats, though the ABC coverage was only giving Greens 1 seat for the upper house.
I observed that Greens do best where there are lots of well-educated/professionals in the area, eg. inner city places like Melbourne and Brunswick (25-29% primary), as well as safe Liberal seats like Hawthorn and Kew (15-19% primary). The worst Green votes are in the predominantly lower-class Labor seats such as Dandenong, and much of country Victoria.
It just shows that somehow we need to reach and educate the lower-class/working class people in order to have much impact - politically at least. Ironically (as my SO pointed out), the climate impact of your average Dandenong resident is probably much less than the average Melbourne/Brunswick/Hawthorn resident due to dwelling occupancy, disposable income and lifestyle.
Comments 2
I observed that Greens do best where there are lots of well-educated/professionals in the area, eg. inner city places like Melbourne and Brunswick (25-29% primary), as well as safe Liberal seats like Hawthorn and Kew (15-19% primary).
The worst Green votes are in the predominantly lower-class Labor seats such as Dandenong, and much of country Victoria.
It just shows that somehow we need to reach and educate the lower-class/working class people in order to have much impact - politically at least. Ironically (as my SO pointed out), the climate impact of your average Dandenong resident is probably much less than the average Melbourne/Brunswick/Hawthorn resident due to dwelling occupancy, disposable income and lifestyle.
Reply
Green voting is definitely linked with education (as is green membership!)
Reply
Leave a comment