Rape...maybe, maybe not

[evilgrins]

You know, it wasn't more than 50 years back where it was considered impossible, from a legal standpoint, for a husband to rape his wife. That ended around the same time it was considerd possible that a husband that beat his wife might possibly be abuse

Comments

[kardashev]

Oh, Lord. Mother Jones News? MJN is pretty one-sided. So much so, that I often refer to them as the lefty version of World Net Daily.

What MJN leaves out is that the bill was co-sponsored by Illinois Democratic Rep. Dan Lipinski. It's not just a GOP thing.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20110128/us_yblog_thelookout/house-abortion-bill-redefines-rape-incest-exceptions

I understand your trepidation about this vaguely worded bill. But seriously, you partisans have got to quit letting so-called "news sources" like Glen Beck, Michael Moore, World Net Daily, and Mother Jones News do your thinking for you. They've all got more spin than live helicopter blade.

[evilgrins]

Partisans? I'm not a partisan.

[evilgrins]

Also, I would not take much in the way of faith in what GB says; he's a moron.

[kardashev]

Hell, I don't put much faith in anything any politician says.

But still, my point stands about these uber-partisan talking heads. They're not going to give you the entire story.

[bimbo_zombie]

You lost me at how abortion debate propaganda = The weird-folks Community.

[evilgrins]

there are many levels of weird. I almost posted an article here today about how Mexican gangs have started launching pot over the border with catapults.

There's a reason this comm has a "news of the weird" tag.