I have wildly mixed feelings about this movie. On the one hand, it was entertaining and there were several bits that made me laugh out loud. On the other hand, there were two things that kind of put me off wanting to see it again, however much I enjoyed myself at the time.
First off, my god but action movies are full of men. (Full of white people
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
(The comment has been removed)
I think an extra weird thing about the whole no killing/killing is the only solution in the movie is that (as I understand it - never really watched the show) on the TV show, the violence was...cartoonish, for lack of a better word. Lots of explosions and flying bullets and car crashes, but for the most part without people dying.
And yes, there are fun movies that don't have so many annoyances in them. *sigh*
Reply
I definitely can not get behind any "pacifism is stupid" messages.
Reply
Reply
On the military issue, the complexities have been realised in the forces- there are at least a few serving trans people on my flist :o)
On the 'non violence under any circumstances' issue, I absolutely get it, but then, I'm a Quaker, which might explain a lot! :o) :o)
Reply
It would actually be quite interesting (and challenging) if someone made an adventure story with a Quaker hero. I'm quite sure it could be done, and equally sure it would be very, very different. It would have the secondary awesomeness of necessitating a clever hero. (Or rather heroes, since a truly non-violent hero wouldn't be working along side violent ones, unless it was to convince them to change to a non-violent approach.) Great, now I want that movie/book/whatever, too.
Reply
There was a film with a Quaker hero set in your civil war made way back, I think, in the 50's although the title escapes me.
Reply
Leave a comment