An interesting tidbit from the TeXhax mailing list …
Context: an inquiry about TeX packages for writing chemistry papers that would work with plain TeX, without requiring LaTeX; a pointer to
https://ctan.org/topic/chemistry was provided, with the note that unfortunately this didn't allow filtering LaTeX-only packages. Another user then suggested
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
Ah yes, the good old days. It sure is nice that software development has improved so much and that crashes and the like are a thing of the past now! :)
Never was a fan of Pascal (and its variants, liek Modula-2 and Oberon). I think Kernighan's critique is on point, but bveyond that it also never felt right to me. (And of course Kernighan is responsible for C, which I believe is single-handedly responsible for many of the software problems we're facing today, from crashes to security issues to ... shall we say unexpected arithmetic [such as non-associative addition], simply by presenting itself as something it's not [a high-level language]. But I digress.)
I used to like Perl a lot; Python, like Pascal, feels unnatural to me. (Though I do like how things like Jupyter and numpy/sympy allow me to easily work with symbolic equations.)
Come to think of it I'm not sure what I'd consider a good language. (Maybe I ( ... )
Reply
Reply
But thinking about it, it's actually true I'm not a fan of most programming languages. Most seem to be created with someone other than the user (i.e. programmer) in mind.
COBOL handling GUIs and relational databases sounds pretty crazy. Then again there's also CobolScript (the COBOL version of Javascript, as I understand it), so I suppose anything's possible.
Reply
Leave a comment