A frequent weapon for Democrats in the 2016 election is to publicly malign those they regard as critics and adversaries as Russia sympathizers, Putin stooges, or outright agents of the Kremlin. To put it mildly, this is not a new tactic in U.S. political discourse, and it’s worth placing it in historical context. That’s particularly true given how
(
Read more... )
Comments 32
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
As for the article? Meh. It really needed an editor willing to use a delete key like a hedge-trimmer. I certainly hope they weren't paying by the word. I suppose the basic idea is that if they enough word salad out there, nobody will notice the basic dodgy logical argument underlying the piece.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Seriously, this is at the level of "The TRUTH about Area 51" level of diatribe. If this is the best the pro-Trump people can do, they really need to pick up their game.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
And the world does not need conflict between the US and Russia. Tbh, I'd take Trump's stance over Hillary's.
Reply
The scaremongering wrt Russia this election is even more damaging bc Obama and Kerry are trying harrd to work with Russia in Syria. Diplomacy is a tapdance indeed.
Reply
Reply
But I suspect it's more simply a "okay the horse is out of the barn and the barn is burning but at least let's not let it torch the whole damn farm" kind of deal
come to think of it though why would you put the horse in a barn and not the stable
Reply
Leave a comment