Thomas Markle: was part of plot to sabotage his daughter's wedding & other royal nonsense...

Sep 17, 2021 14:53

Enter for a round-up post of only some of the many tawdry tales from the British royal family. Buckle up!

here we go )

royalty / royal family, nobody

Leave a comment

Comments 53

insomniachobs September 17 2021, 13:52:36 UTC
The rumour I heard was that he’d disinherited Andrew and that was why it was being kept quiet lol

Reply

wormsinthedirt September 17 2021, 13:58:11 UTC
Wouldn't that actually make the royal family look good, though? People are waiting for them to condemn Andrew in some way...

Reply

insomniachobs September 17 2021, 14:07:02 UTC
They’re all protecting him because he’s the Queen’s favourite, showing up Phillip as dissenting just highlights their behaviour more (especially since Phillip wasn’t exactly known for being the sensitive woke one) and it’d be talked up as a rift

Edit: hit send too soon, in reality it’s probably all more routine than wanting to hide the contents but I’m enjoying the rumours lol

Reply

browneyedguuurl September 17 2021, 14:30:04 UTC
I would LIVE if he did that. LMAO!

Reply


tifag September 17 2021, 13:53:11 UTC
Sealing of the will seems pretty standard, the Queens mother and sister will are both sealed.

I hate that Thomas Markle is still getting press, it’s clear he has nothing to say he just wants attention.

Reply

tlovesdolphin September 17 2021, 16:32:23 UTC
Not just them, apparently it's a long tradition.

Reply


wormsinthedirt September 17 2021, 13:55:59 UTC
The ~emasculation body language experts have me DYING, lmao. Not that it matters, but I feel like that's a fairly typical "male" pose?

Reply


syvlie0o0 September 17 2021, 13:58:29 UTC
Why is Thomas Markle on Australian tv so much? What's going on down there?

but anyway people get absolutely unhinged and psychotic over these two and I hope they have good protection.

Also Philip probably left money to his mistress(es).

Reply

snortingcoke September 17 2021, 14:32:16 UTC
australia media is murdoch owned and a lot of their news is in the fox news vein

Reply

curdlesnoots September 17 2021, 16:34:22 UTC
Ironically he doesn’t own this station but the mogul who does is paying the legal fees of an alleged war criminal who’s suing the mogul’s competitor for alleging the alleged war criminal committed said war crimes so…different zebra same stripes.

Reply

curdlesnoots September 17 2021, 16:24:12 UTC
It’s part of the royal Commonwealth family. The Queen is grandma, UK is Mum, the US is the prodigal son, Thomas is the creepy guy your parents make you call uncle and Australia is the deadbeat kid who had to be kicked out of home but no hard feelings, just want to be in the will family Christmas photo.

Reply


Bad Photoshop or wrong lens or wrong outfit? renner4ever September 17 2021, 14:05:01 UTC
Meghan's body looks stretched horizontally & squashed vertically. I know she has a boxy body type but she looks weird.Harry's black outfit & his slight crouched pose is making him look weird too.

Reply

Re: Bad Photoshop or wrong lens or wrong outfit? jinxeh13 September 17 2021, 14:06:34 UTC
Yeah, the criticisms over their ~body language are very stupid, but at the end of the day it's still not a great photo. Awkward editing and posing.

Reply

Re: Bad Photoshop or wrong lens or wrong outfit? misscrystal September 17 2021, 17:58:30 UTC
All the boxy outfits and weird photoshop on her in those photos makes me think it's a poor attempt at covering post-partum weight on Meghan.
Not sure if that was her call or the magazine's.

Reply

Re: Bad Photoshop or wrong lens or wrong outfit? jinxeh13 September 17 2021, 18:03:01 UTC
I would think the magazine, maybe. She didn't seem to care about hiding the post-partum bump after their first kid was born.

Maybe unpopular opinion, idk, but I've never liked how she dresses herself, tho. Her wedding dress did nothing for her figure and wasn't altered to her body, and she always goes for strange, shapeless ensembles.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up