Lawsuit against Kevin Spacey dismissed

May 15, 2021 17:34



Note: I'm using this older tweet because it's the most recent one related to the story. All the info after it was reported today.

A man who sued Kevin Spacey and accused the actor of sexually abusing him as a teenager must identify himself if his civil action is to continue, judge rules. https://t.co/Xd7KQV4c5u
- NBC News (@NBCNews) May 9, 2021
Read more... )

kevin spacey, legal / lawsuit

Leave a comment

Comments 47

(The comment has been removed)

gillenvillain May 15 2021, 23:44:47 UTC
What pisses me off further is that he was 14 YEARS OLD at the time it happened.

Fuck that asshole judge. This is why victims don't come forward and when they do, they get shit like this. Of course they don't know how fucking HARD it is to come forward at all, especially when it happened to you as a kid. Chances are people he knows now don't know this about him and it's no one's fucking business anyway. Certainly not the fucking public.

Reply

daijouboo May 16 2021, 22:45:47 UTC
I have heard at least 3 stories from various people about Kevin Spacey being sexually inappropriate with young men and in one of those cases, the guy was a minor. He told his friends about it but never went to the authorities or tried to come forward.

Reply

lilith20godrich May 16 2021, 03:36:06 UTC
I read that his identity wasn't revealed in the documents, so Spacey and his lawyers didn't know who is accusing him. In this case, i kind of get it.
But if it's all about public knowing, it's outrageous that lawsuit was dismissed.

Reply


off_daze May 15 2021, 22:48:14 UTC
I feel for the victim. This is so unjust. Why put himself in further harm?

Reply


wonky May 15 2021, 22:50:36 UTC
.....why can't it all be done anonymously through lawyers? They're a victim who's been through something deeply traumatic but the court system insists it be a public matter? It's sick.

ruled that the public has a legitimate interest in the identity of the man "because C.D. has made his allegations against a public figure,"

WTF? Fuck that judge.

Reply

lady_rosier May 16 2021, 12:27:12 UTC
I totally get if the victim had to personally meet the judge or something, but not how is public interest relevant in this criminal matter. Leave that poor man alone.

Reply

wonky May 17 2021, 01:56:07 UTC
Yeah, it feels like the judge is trying to punish him or something. Who cares if there's public interest? WTF does that even mean or have anything to do with anything?

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

insomniachobs May 15 2021, 23:56:40 UTC
In the UK rape complainants are by statute granted lifelong anonymity from the moment they make the allegation. They can waive it if they want, but otherwise it's a crime to name or make them identifiable. Some other sex offences are covered by that too.

There are a few exceptions where the court can lift the anonymity (variations on the theme of not naming would prejudice the trial/appeal process) but they're rarely used.

Reply


arilicious May 15 2021, 22:53:00 UTC
why should he have to publicly identify himself in order to get justice? that's awful
i feel terrible :(

Reply


Leave a comment

Up