Entries must feature "a predominantly non-English dialogue track," per Academy rules, but a review found that two-third of Austria's entry is in English...
https://t.co/3XMfW6WUJf via
@thr- Scott Feinberg (@ScottFeinberg)
November 11, 2019Entries must feature "a predominantly non-English dialogue track," per Academy rules
(
Read more... )
Comments 37
Francophone countries like Benin can submit an entirely French language film and no one would be like "try again in your native language". But countries like Nigeria can't get away with that. This film had pidgin-english in it - I wonder how that was counted.
Also, see how Britain is submitting a film in a Malawian language as their entry.
Reply
Reply
lol - I pretty much summarised it in my previous comment.
English drives the infrastructure.
exactly! I know Nigerian people in Nigerian that didn't even speak a native language growing up... my brother being one of them....
Reply
Reply
unlike Nigeria they have done this lots of times before, they should know the rules
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Could an American film enter if it was in an indigenous language or Spanish?
Reply
Canada (and a lot of other countries) couldn't even submit a film until like a decade ago, the rules used to be that it had to be in the countries official language - so if it was English, then you couldn't submit a film no matter what language it was in.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Another issue is that foreign films are often international co-productions, and a lot of films can be made thanks to funding from the UK or Australia. If you ban the UK or Australia from submitting films to this category you would also diminish the chances for a lot of films that are not in English and deserve to be highlighted.
I do agree that there needs to be some kind of exception for countries like Nigeria, where the academy wouldn't usually take their movies into consideration despite being in English, but I don't think banning certain countries would solve the category's issues.
Reply
Leave a comment