Box Office: ‘King Arthur’ Looks Like an Epic Flop

May 10, 2017 23:46


Box office: #KingArthur looks like an epic flop https://t.co/jqWXQiTwis pic.twitter.com/j0HsB97zUD
- Variety (@Variety) 10. Mai 2017

source 2

- 24% on Rotten Tomatoes

- a $175 million budget (sans promo)

- only opened with $25 $20 million

charlie hunnam, box office, flop

Leave a comment

Comments 118

forestofthedead May 10 2017, 21:51:10 UTC
Oh damn I really wanted to see this.

Reply


hjalmartazar May 10 2017, 21:51:56 UTC
I saw a commercial for it yesterday or monday, it looks okay. I didn't know it was already out tho.

Reply


notoriousreign May 10 2017, 21:52:03 UTC
Whaaaaaat but it looks so... well epic lol. I need it to make more than Snatched noooo

Reply

marywebgirl May 10 2017, 22:02:23 UTC
They're setting up for the premiere of Snatched by my office, and when I walked by on my way to lunch I overheard a few people saying things like "That looks terrible" or dragging Amy Shumer.

Reply


saemcrh May 10 2017, 21:52:13 UTC
So two back-to-back flops for Charlie?

Though Lost City of Z didn't get critically panned, quite the opposite.

Reply

sea_thoughts May 10 2017, 21:55:46 UTC
Lost City of Z was great but released at a weird time, should have been in the winter to get serious attention.

Reply

saemcrh May 10 2017, 21:58:18 UTC
idk if it's because I don't watch actual TV with ads/interact with enough people, but I just felt like the promo/hype was non-existent for it.

Reply

sea_thoughts May 10 2017, 21:59:27 UTC
You're not wrong, there wasn't much promo for it, again I think because they released it at a weird time. I would recommend it for anyone who likes a good historical story/mystery. The book is even more fascinating.

Reply


snippy_carrot May 10 2017, 21:53:34 UTC
Even if it wasn't to be a critical mess, I have no idea what would possess anyone to greenlight 175M+ for a film like this.

It's like studios want to lose ridiculous sums of cash.

Reply

itsme_eloise May 10 2017, 22:58:37 UTC
this is why the death of the mid-range movie makes me so sad. Either it's high-stakes super expensive risks like this or an indie movie that someone filmed on their iphone. There's nothing in the middle anymore.

Reply

snippy_carrot May 11 2017, 01:45:39 UTC
It's frustrating because there's still definitely audiences for films of that size.

Just in the last calendar year, La La Land made $150M DOM/440M WW and cost $30M to make, Hidden Figures did $169M/$228M on $26M, Split went $138M/$275M on $14M (depending on the source), Arrival made on $100M/$199M on $47M... even Money Monster did $94M WW on a $27M budget.

Reply

maidenhell May 11 2017, 02:05:55 UTC
Do romantic comedies exist anymore? I was just thinking about how Julia Roberts and Kate Hudson built their careers on them, but I can't recall a recent one (or an actress now known for them).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up