Iran Attempts Bombing Raid on America Which Would Have Killed Dozens in Washington DC

Oct 12, 2011 07:44

Yesterday we learned that Iranian agents plotted to bomb a crowded Washington, DC restaurant at lunchtime, in an incredibly-bloodthirsty plot to murder the Saudi ambassador to the United States of America. This attempt, if backed or even sheltered by the Iranian government, is of course an act of war against both America and Saudi Arabia, and ( ( Read more... )

america, diplomacy, war on terror, iran, terrorism

Leave a comment

oronoda October 13 2011, 18:29:18 UTC
You are writing that on the assumption that they're organized. Iran will collapse within itself soon enough. Iranians save the Iranians and the Arabs will save the Arabs. It is that simple ( ... )

Reply

oronoda October 14 2011, 20:58:29 UTC
Hmm... *yawn*

I don't appreciate libelous accusations from someone who is unemployed and hasn't crawled out of their mom's basement.

Reply

cutelildrow October 14 2011, 21:05:26 UTC
Nor should we really take them seriously, especially given that it's yama who's the source. You know, he who can't be bothered to try back up his lies with even the most tissue-flimsy sources in the least? Mr. "bring it on and get smashed in the face in the massive weight of his own failure"?

Yeah, we have no reason to actually take him seriously... and we're not. I wonder how long it takes for him to realize this...

Probably doesn't since he keeps coming back for more humiliation.

Reply

ext_531464 October 14 2011, 18:14:26 UTC
People who aren't Saudi propagandists have this to say about the first chapter of Aubade:

"You're talented. Keep writing. Do not stop. It would be a damn shame."

"Your descriptions of food made my mouth water and when there were descriptions they were really good, if a little over the top in places (such as "The bright stars on dark night sky were shattered diamonds, with ruby and sapphire dust sprinkled lightly." I think this is a beautiful sentence but you don't need to say both 'dark' and 'night' as one usually implicates the other and since there are stars to be seen, the reader can assume that this doesn't take place in a northern place where it's bright all night)."

Reply

jordan179 October 14 2011, 18:34:16 UTC
The destruction of the Iranian regime would be a "good thing." What Khomeini did, and what the current junta is doing, are a perfect excuse to take down that regime.

I have little reason to hate Persia as a country. Why, some of their ancestors were even fairly nice to some of mine, over two and a half millennia ago.

Reply

ext_531464 October 14 2011, 16:54:54 UTC
The ones who are against equality are the rulers, not the protestors. The rulers have been depriving shi'ites of rights, jailing medics for treating protestors, and abusing prisoners.
I know after the comments in the other entry that those are acceptable to you, but I'm going to point that out anyway.

Reply

oronoda October 14 2011, 16:59:41 UTC
Actually, I never said any of that. If you were literate you would have seen that.

What I am trying to explain to you that the protesters are not this overwhelmingly benevolent entity. There are many different layers to it. Yes, those medics did not deserve to be jailed for helping protesters who were injured. Many innocent people were arrested for just expressing what they believe.

HOWEVER, there is a segment of the protesters that are NOT for equality and if they gained power, could be just as devastating as the regime. That doesn't mean the Bahraini government shouldn't adopt reform but people should be mindful of the Shia extremists.

Reply

ext_531464 October 14 2011, 17:03:30 UTC
The Bahraini government needs to go.

Reply

oronoda October 14 2011, 17:13:52 UTC
It definitely needs reform. Yes. But it isn't that simple. In order for proper reform to be put in place and so you don't have a Bahraini "Reign of Terror", the protesters need to check themselves.

Reply

ext_531464 October 14 2011, 17:16:48 UTC
The regime and their supporters mean nothing to me. If they have to flee Bahrain, it is their actions that made it so.

Reply

oronoda October 14 2011, 17:23:17 UTC
But then it makes the opposition hypocrites.

And it also makes you a horrid person for suggesting that.

Reply

cutelildrow October 14 2011, 17:26:03 UTC
Truly horrid. Well, yama is a hypocrite, but we knew that already.

But sometimes kicking the son of a bitch again and again with his rampant lack of brains, his lies, and his repeated hypocrisy gets a bit boring. We've already predicted he would do this and he did exactly as we thought he would.

Dull, really...

Reply

ext_531464 October 14 2011, 17:28:29 UTC
It's their fault for jailing opposition without trial, and even jailing medics for daring to help hurt protestors. They can't do that and not expect the Bahraini people to retaliate.

Reply

jordan179 October 14 2011, 18:43:37 UTC
What makes you imagine that a Bahraini Reign of Terror would confine its list of victims to those who actually did those things? Historically, Reigns of Terror don't. Once you start engaging in mass executions without due process of law, it's hard to stop.

Reply

jordan179 October 14 2011, 18:41:33 UTC
You don't really grasp the concept of a "reign of terror," do you?

Here, let me make it simple for you. Have you ever read A Tale of Two Cities? Do you think that all the people whom the First Republic of France decided to execute were 'aristocrats?' Do you think that they all deserved to die? Do you think that they all got the option of "fleeing" and stayed out of sheer stubborness?

Reply

cutelildrow October 14 2011, 17:23:44 UTC
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND there we have it ladies and gentlemen. Yama hasn't even got a good REASON why he says one group should survive over the other - only his say so.

He keeps proving his pure high-octane stupid again and again! LET US FIND OUT HOW LOW HE WILL SINK!

Since he's in clear support of the murder of Iranian children by the Iranian government, I'm hard pressed to imagine worse!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up