*Sigh*. I gotta get my ego out of trying to save the SCA from its own stupid...

Nov 16, 2015 12:48

[Mostly musing to myself as a bit of journal-therapy, although conversation on the topic(s) is welcomed ( Read more... )

sca

Leave a comment

Comments 35

(The comment has been removed)

jducoeur November 16 2015, 18:35:40 UTC
Lovely -- thanks much!

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

jducoeur November 16 2015, 18:48:03 UTC
Good luck on the good-decisions thing. You might want to loop in Countess Marguerite, who is a hardcore process wonk and quite passionate on the subject -- she and I have talked about the problem extensively...

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

jducoeur November 16 2015, 18:35:24 UTC
The Order of Valiance is the new Peerage being mooted for all the "other" martial activities. It's a lovely idea, save that it would have been better if it had happened instead of the Order of Defense. As it is, having three martial Peerages -- one for heavy list, one for fencing, and one for everything else -- makes no sense at all from a structural POV. But I think it's what's going to happen, and it's better than having all the other activities locked out.

As for the anger, much of it comes from a sense of, "You've broken my community!" I'm painfully aware of how things used to work, and while I recognize that change is natural and healthy, far too many of the changes are just plain *dumb* and counter-productive...

Reply

mrgrumpybear November 17 2015, 03:43:11 UTC
Change is natural and healthy...

No; change happens. It is not necessarily healthy. Sometimes change can be damned unhealthy.

Reply

hfcougar November 22 2015, 00:50:56 UTC
This.

Reply


Getting a 'divorce' kfitzwarin November 16 2015, 18:52:41 UTC
I don't have anything to recommend except to commiserate. Been there, done that, mostly had to get a divorce - as much as I love the people, it wasn't being fun.

Reply

Re: Getting a 'divorce' jducoeur November 16 2015, 20:00:00 UTC
Yeah, sympathies. Probably the single biggest reason I've declined nomination to the Board is that I am *so* sure that the experience would be so wretched for everyone involved that it would drive me entirely out of the club...

Reply


Changes to the NMS policy manyra November 16 2015, 19:16:41 UTC
There have been a few requests by An Tir, Avacal and the East to exempt informal activities. Here in Avacal, we have three groups who charge for fight practices, curia, monthly taverns. Donations just didn't cover the costs. To collect NMS on those would not only piss off a lot of people and hurt recruitment, it will be an exchequer's nightmare especially given it has to be sent in within 10 days.

What is happening here - the quick announcement although we had an idea of it coming before the BOD meeting, no follow through and no direction on what to say to the general populace is really ticking me off. But I shouldn't be surprised. All I can do is be more open to those who work directly with me.

Reply


keshwyn November 17 2015, 01:07:59 UTC
Sadly, not true. I know if at least one Carolingian practice that DOES collect a per-practice fee, to offset costs. :-(

Reply

rufinia November 17 2015, 01:12:12 UTC
WHich one?

Reply

keshwyn November 17 2015, 03:10:22 UTC
I have been reminded it may be a strongly-encouraged donation. Archery practice at Peter the Red's has a $1 donation (?) which goes toward replacement loaner arrows and targets, as they do tend to get broken, worn out, or lost fairly quickly.

Reply

rufinia November 17 2015, 03:14:15 UTC
We may need to tweak phrasing a tiny bit to make sure our asses are covered, but it's not something to be worried about.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up