Bigbang art and other things

Aug 18, 2008 11:26

The SGA Bigbang site went live last week. I did artwork for leahwoof's (Leah & springwoof) lovely story Enthrall.
Preview:

Read more... )

rodney, rant, sga, blather, john, art

Leave a comment

Comments 5

(The comment has been removed)

ileliberte August 18 2008, 17:52:37 UTC
I'm no art fiend, but I could swear the composition and styles of some of these paintings look exactly like, or very much similar to, western (old master) pieces
Yes, could be. These aren't ancient pieces or anything and don't usually accompany religious texts either, it would be interesting to see what pieces they may have been inspired from :)

I have little sympathy unfortunately, if I was stupid enough to wait around 6 hours just to exchange a few sentences with a TV person I don't know at all, I'd deserve to have pranks played on me too :/ I was unsurprised but still sad to see that they were all grown up too, not even excusable by young age factor.

Reply


ratcreature August 18 2008, 16:00:51 UTC
Here's where I out myself as totally clueless, but I looked at the Mahabharat and Ramayan pictures, and I mostly wondered: what's with all the blue people? I mean, I have no idea about Indian mythology but why are some blue? Is it a symbolic thing?

Reply

ileliberte August 18 2008, 18:05:43 UTC
Heh, yes, it's a symbolic thing. Vishnu is one of the foremost Gods in Indian mythology, and the color of his skin was blue, reflecting the colors of the clouds, the skies and the water, since he was all-pervasive. Both Krishna and Ram were incarnations (avatars) of his, i.e. the forms he took when he came down to Earth at different points of time, hence the blue skin. Krishna indicates dark-skinned as well. So all the blue people you see are various incarnations of Vishnu (the blue person with a peacock feather in his crown is Krishna).

Reply

ratcreature August 18 2008, 18:39:18 UTC
Ah, that makes sense. Unfamiliar symbolism is always hard. European medieval and renaissance paintings are completely cryptic to me because there's all kinds of random stuff that has actually some religious meaning that was obvious to the audience then. Like you'd get virgin Mary with a baby Jesus on a throne, which seems sensible enough, but then you see that the magnificent throne has a random large cucumber on a vine hanging over the expensive fabric, which is very wtf? unless you know that it was a fertility symbol because of the seeds but also one for mortality because they grow quickly or something, and so on. Basically any random object has some symbolic meaning that then assembles the actual message the thing was supposed to have.

Reply


geeky_ginger August 18 2008, 16:58:24 UTC
Swear to god the SPN fandom (which I'm a member of) is begining to grate me the wrong way...it seems like more and more fans are getting uber bitchy when they don't get their way. It's like more and more of them are thinking because they watch the show, because they buy the merch that the actors should treat them as Gods....umm...nope.

It's ridiculous...do they not realize that ok, Jim can go to dinner with them because he's not on the same schedule as Jared and Jensen. Those boys get worked to death and you have fans who think that just because they show up, it means those two should drop everything and talk to them. People need to be realistic.

*sigh*

Why is there so much chaos in what used to be an awesome fandom!?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up