polar bear sticker on the hamster's domicile

Feb 10, 2006 11:48

This is likely to be a somewhat rambley and unfocused entry, as I am neither particularly awake nor in particularly good spirits. Likely, there will be short paragraphs. Likely, maybe, perhaps, something unpleasant will be said. Or not. But I advise that you get off now if you're prone to sea sickness, hives, or sudden bouts of impatience. My hair ( Read more... )

darwin day, olympics, sirenia, doh, letter s, paleo

Leave a comment

Comments 11

Consider me subscribed mackatlaw February 10 2006, 17:27:59 UTC
Went and did the whole Paypal thing. Now after work tonight, I can sit down and peruse. Thanks for writing!

Mack

Reply

Re: Consider me subscribed greygirlbeast February 10 2006, 20:34:44 UTC
Thanks for writing!

Thanks for subscribing.

Reply


stsisyphus February 10 2006, 17:56:01 UTC
It's the climax before the climax (before the final climax).

So you're saying that reading DOH will lead to multiple climaxes?

...it's a novel without a "villain," that it only contains characters which are at crossed purposes. Of course, I suppose the same could be said for any supposed protagonist/antagonist relationship.

Well, "villain" suggests a kind of malevolent intent, a knowing decision to commit evil in counter-action to an established "good". If the characters are only committing actions based on their unconventional views on morality or conduct, it becomes fuzzy. Do we truly condemn the ghul for eating human flesh?

You know, I don't think I even want to ponder that rhetorical question.

For the price of just two or three big cups of that bitter swill Starbuck's insists upon calling coffee, you can have two or three new pieces a fiction each month, plus illustrations and etc. For less than the price of a pizza. Come on. It's the right thing to do. Search your feelings. You know it to be true. If you only knew the ( ... )

Reply

Ghuls? mackatlaw February 10 2006, 19:21:02 UTC
"Do we truly condemn the ghul for eating human flesh?"

Damn right we do. They may be perfectly within their rights as a species to live on a diet of long pig, but as long as you're part of the human race, sympathy only goes so far. Understand the ghuls? Sure. Feeding is a part of nature. So is death. Fortunately, the scavenger ghuls do not present enough of a predatory threat to come to general humanity's attention.

And the wonderful circle of life, predator and prey, continues...
Though I have been known to say that humans need a predator other than themselves to thin the herd, but other than microbes and viri, we're short on that. We need a better vampire.

Mack

Reply

Re: Ghuls? stsisyphus February 10 2006, 19:34:10 UTC
Fortunately, the scavenger ghuls do not present enough of a predatory threat to come to general humanity's attention...Though I have been known to say that humans need a predator other than themselves to thin the herd, but other than microbes and viri, we're short on that. We need a better vampire.

Nope. Zombies. Takes out the Ghul and the Pinks at the same time. Actually, that might make for some amusing crossover fic: Kiernan Ghul vs. Romero Zombies. The Night Your Snack Snapped Back.

Brains!

Reply

greygirlbeast February 10 2006, 20:33:10 UTC
So you're saying that reading DOH will lead to multiple climaxes?

Indeed. Guaranteed.

Do we truly condemn the ghul for eating human flesh?

You know, I don't think I even want to ponder that rhetorical question.

Well, I don't. The ghouls aren't human, and condemning them for eating humans would be like condemning a lion for eating humans. Also, they tend to favour the flesh of already dead humans, and where's the harm in that? I addressed this issue in the afterword to the subpress edition of Low Red Moon, specifically as it pertains to Narcissa, concluding that I had trouble holding Narcissa to human codes of conduct as she wasn't precisely human.

I swear, my internal reading voice actually morphed from "Caitlin-voice" to "Xtian Children's Charities-Voice" to "Wilford Brimley-Voice" to "James Earl Jones-voice" while reading this. Very strange.

*snork*

Reply


timireznor February 10 2006, 18:22:36 UTC
Have you thought of offering the velvet covers to those of us who have the lettered edition of FT&T?

Reply

greygirlbeast February 10 2006, 20:27:31 UTC
Have you thought of offering the velvet covers to those of us who have the lettered edition of FT&T?

Don't you mean the numbered?

Anyway, Spooky sez she may offer black velveteen bags lined with black silk or satine for people who bought the numbered, or even for the trade edition, but she still has to work out the details, including cost.

Reply


mlle_rouge February 10 2006, 19:44:54 UTC
I'm too poor to bid on the auction, but for what it's worth I promoted Sirenia Digest on my little webzine.

Reply

greygirlbeast February 10 2006, 20:27:57 UTC
but for what it's worth I promoted Sirenia Digest on my little webzine.

Thanks!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up