A [short] reversal of my decision

Feb 16, 2008 13:31

Have to interrupt my silence, this is too irritating to pass.


A loud noise had disturbed my peaceful Saturday breakfast at 10am. There were shouts and drumbeat on the street, half-a-block away. From my window I could only see a parked patrol car, so I grabbed my camera and went outside to find out.

I have written about this subject before, here. ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 11

indolentmick February 17 2008, 04:02:27 UTC
...you are the plague!Oh man, that is comic ( ... )

Reply

eta_ta February 17 2008, 13:50:40 UTC
G, I didn't intend to return here at all. It's just my new place isn't ready yet, and I was too ruffled to let this pass unnoted.

Slam-lord is an indication of my weird foreign ways of communicating in English.

Although I could add another paragraph on contents of the paper I got handed by a fur-wearing activist, pertaining to his character and supposed crimes he committed up in the Bronx, it's too slimy to write about.

Fountainhead is well worth your effort.

Reply

indolentmick February 17 2008, 19:44:37 UTC
The Brooklyn Paper is good for lining the bottom of bird or snake cages, but not much else. The editors of that rag are just as adamently opposed to the impending-for what seems like the last decade-construction of an Ikea in Red Hook.


... )

Reply


_s_a_v_v_a_ March 11 2008, 20:01:45 UTC
Hi, sorry for intrusion

I used to live not far from there and remember demonstrations in front of the Green Church. I don't think any other neighborehood of Brooklyn has so many churches! I do support development, but what's disturbing is that most probably they would build some disgusting crapdominimum with luxury window A/C units.

By the way, if you are in the area, what's happening with the three old collonial houses on 74th street between 3rd and 4th, just accross from the school yard? Last winter I remember seeing "poison" signs on all three of them. Then there was a short article on some of the hood's blogs saying that the owner claims to restore them. And then we moved, and I suspect that the restoration work might have been extended into a demolition and a full-scale construction.

Reply

eta_ta March 16 2008, 00:03:52 UTC
Don't know about the houses on 74th; I don't think I know of any school on that intersection ( ... )

Reply

_s_a_v_v_a_ March 16 2008, 19:55:08 UTC
i looked up some more info on the three buildings on 74th street:
http://www.brooklyneagle.com/categories/category.php?category_id=27&id=15030
and
http://www.gothamcityinsider.com/2008/01/they-paved-paradise-and-put-up-another.html
Bay Ridge is so conservative. People there don't like changes. They like their churches, humangous houses with nickel railings and botanica exhibitions outside. I expect there will be more marching and yelling. Be strong!

Reply

eta_ta March 16 2008, 20:40:08 UTC
Thanks for the links. I'm not against preservation, but within common sense. Not all old buildings are worth preserving; the old Victorians pictured @ the link are definitely nothing special; besides, the claim that 3-family condos will not sell is ridiculous: there is always seller's market in Bay Ridge exactly because inventory is low and demand - high.
Also, there was this quote by Preservation Society Chair, claiming the "historical low-rise quality of Bay Ridge": not really. Look at the Shore Road and all the adjacent avenues and crossing streets, there are so many hirise coops and apartment buildings there (relatively hi-rise, about 10-15 floors high) built in 1920's to 1950's. I'm sure at the time of construction they replaced more Victorian horror - and residents are better off now.

Thank you for your interest and good wishes.

Reply


Совершенно "OFF" zaleph April 14 2008, 13:40:10 UTC
Я прошу прощения за то, что я не помещаю этот комментарий там, где он был бы уместен и не был бы "OFF", но я давно уже вышел из общения с user(ом) "Wall4", а когда я вывожу себя из общения с кем бы то ни было, я совершенно обрываю все формы общения с ними - в их Журналах или в чужих. Я не собираюсь комментировать сказанное им, кроме, как сказать, что сказанное им недостойно никого, называющего себя мужчиной, независимо от чего бы то ни было; это просто низко и недостойно. И хотя мне вполне импонирует и то, что Вы сказали и как Вы это сказали, я вынужден заметить, что Ваш обмен комментариями, как с "автором", так и его "протагонистами" нарушает известное "Не мечи бисер перед свиньями". Ещё раз, извините.:)

Reply

Re: Совершенно "OFF" eta_ta April 14 2008, 17:18:05 UTC
Thank you.
Sometimes the silence is more upsetting; this was one of those cases.

Sorry for English, I'm at work.

Reply

Re: Совершенно "OFF" zaleph April 14 2008, 18:00:56 UTC
Yes, I can easily relate to the same notion and I know how difficult is it sometimes to resist the temptation to speak your mind, especially in situations like this one. But usually I'm listening to my inner voice, which tells me that it's not worth it to talk to people with such state of mind and who are capable to express their opinions in such unintelligent and a degrading way.
Nothing to be sorry about.:))I'm at work too and I can easily understand that not all computers where "taught" to speak Russian in the same way, as I did with mine.:))

Reply

Re: Совершенно "OFF" eta_ta April 15 2008, 02:09:16 UTC
Всегда делаю ту же ошибку: всё кажется - может я недостаточно понятно обьясняю. Вот зайду с другой стороны, приведу пример близкий собеседнику, и дойдёт - ан нет. Никогда не доходит.

Спасибо за ваш комментарий.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up