(Untitled)

Jun 14, 2007 12:42

Here are the pages for the two new SPN characters, word for word.. ( spoilers.. )

supernatural, tv

Leave a comment

Comments 19

zesty_sushi June 14 2007, 20:49:28 UTC
I think they're both skanky ass hoes. I hope neither of the boys gives into their skankiness, but I honestly think at least one of them will. More likely Dean because like the whole 'I'M GONNA DIE' thing.

Reply

dragynville June 16 2007, 21:46:04 UTC
That's how they're coming off to me too. Maybe it's Kripke's plan to get rid of them?

Reply


gillianinoz June 14 2007, 23:39:56 UTC
Hmm, the story sounds interesting anyway. The old crystal skull!

I can't say the dialogue is that bad - the women sound like they are trying a little too hard. I seriously doubt that's the way to seduce Sammy, at least I hope not. And I'm not sure how closely Dean is gonna want to flirt with a maybe-evil chick with the future he has.

I still live in hope.

Reply

dragynville June 16 2007, 21:48:19 UTC
After reading this, I'm hoping Kripke is writing them this way so the audience will be glad to not see them hook up and be glad to be rid of them.

Reply


lyra_wing June 15 2007, 02:52:55 UTC
Okay, my gut reaction on reading the audition pages is that they're being set up as... adversaries. And/or foils. Counter-viewpoints to Sam and Dean. Maybe some rough-and-tumble love-and-hate going on, too.

Which, in my opinion, is good! Sam and Dean are too united now, too coordinated in their thinking, and they need an opposite view to argue against. Because they don't argue with each other anymore, not on the big issues.

Reply

dragynville June 16 2007, 21:50:06 UTC
I wouldn't mind them as adversaries and such (like Gordon was), so long as they stay that way. I really don't want to see either of our boys hook up with one of these women, what with the way they're reading.

Reply

lyra_wing June 16 2007, 22:13:33 UTC
I don't see anything wrong with the way they're reading. They're reading as equals, with their own viewpoints. If they were guys, and the script was word-for-word the same, would you still have a problem with them?

Reply

dragynville June 16 2007, 22:28:18 UTC
As regular characters, yeah. I'm not interested in major screentime for others, I'm invested for Sam and Dean. It's the attitude, the conceit, the rigidity, they display that is off-putting. In fact, everything that I disliked in Gordon (which may be Kripke's master plan if, in deed, these characters were a CW directive).

Reply


mishaphappens June 16 2007, 20:27:27 UTC
I don't know...I kind of like Ruby. Because she likes a Badass!Sam. XD I'm not so sure about Bela; I hate it when girls act tough because half the time, girly, you're going to get your ass kicked. Preferably by Dean.

I'm going to agree with Lyra, though, and say that these girls seem to be just temporary, but recurring, characters who are just going to shake some things up.

Positive thinking, Dragyn!

Reply

dragynville June 16 2007, 21:55:22 UTC
I don't like the implication that she's been hanging around them for weeks though. I watch for my boys, not random side characters, you know?

I can take it if goes that way and shades of romance don't enter into it. If I wanted soapy love stories, I'd watch One Tree Hill.

But I'm so bad at it! :(

Reply


Leave a comment

Up