If I'm going to get "squicked out" because somebody in the midst of NRE with my partner is ridiculously overenthusiastic like a slobbery puppy to a point that's mildly embarassing . . . well, I'm not going to be very good at this whole poly thing, am I?
Since when does being poly mean we have to be ok with some near-stranger acting like a possessive idiot after a single IRL meeting? Having a bad feeling about "somebody in the midst of NRE with my partner is ridiculously overenthusiastic like a slobbery puppy to a point that's mildly embarassing" after only three weeks of online chats doesn't make them ill-suited to polyamory.
I think there's a big continuum between "having a bad feeling" and "being squicked out" [with the context suggesting a sufficiently negative reaction to veto the partner based on it].
Really? What is the technical definition of "squicked out"? The OP stated that she based her veto on a lot of things, including the OSO editing her husband's online profile, telling him to lie to his wife, the "overenthusiastic" response, as well as other things, and her decision was reinforced by a death threat. I think it's a little premature to want to take away her poly card for that decision, especially when you consider that it was in their first poly relationship ever.
"The best advice I can give you in your situation is to avoid this random list of my own personal pet peeves."
Yeah, she doesn't seem to have a good grasp of the difference between specific anecdote and generalized advice, but comments further down make me think that her anecdote was actually about an untrustworthy person. It just seems like it would have been more useful to talk about, you know, the ACTUAL untrustworthy behaviors, instead of how she... what, dislikes enthusiasm? I'm not even sure.
The list was pretty vague, wasn't it? I loved the one about "Don't try to persuade him to grow/shave facial hair or get a tattoo or a piercing." Facial hair grows back/can be shaved again, but if the guy is so deep into NRE that he comes home with (a) a large portion of skin significantly and permanently altered, or (b) a big honkin' Prince Albert, then he just might be the one with the stability problem.
Wow... I guess you really can blame a girl for trying. :)
I've run into people interested in my partner who do at least half the things on that list... I smile, grit my teeth, and remind myself of how clueless I get when I have NRE. I guess that lady has never had that insight.
Comments 33
If I'm going to get "squicked out" because somebody in the midst of NRE with my partner is ridiculously overenthusiastic like a slobbery puppy to a point that's mildly embarassing . . . well, I'm not going to be very good at this whole poly thing, am I?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yeah, she doesn't seem to have a good grasp of the difference between specific anecdote and generalized advice, but comments further down make me think that her anecdote was actually about an untrustworthy person. It just seems like it would have been more useful to talk about, you know, the ACTUAL untrustworthy behaviors, instead of how she... what, dislikes enthusiasm? I'm not even sure.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
good lord. That's so sick and sad.
Reply
I've run into people interested in my partner who do at least half the things on that list... I smile, grit my teeth, and remind myself of how clueless I get when I have NRE. I guess that lady has never had that insight.
Reply
Leave a comment