(Untitled)

[derspassvogel]

Reading secondary philosophical literature about Kierkegaard is depressing. How many trees have been wasted on this crap? Modern philosophy suffers from the same delusion as modern society: the idea that one is entitled to everything. Anyone can understand anything so long as he can read the text and analyze the concepts contained therein. This

Comments

[rsandlin]

Your right James. I have yet to read a decent secondary source on Kierkegaard. In fact, there have been very few good secondary sources on most philosophers.

In what way did the this particular philosopher (I know who you are speaking of) 'trivialize' Kierkegaard? I don't disagree, but want to know your reason's for thinking this.