Comments | cyphersushi: This is not the squee-post you are looking for...

cyphersushi

This is not the squee-post you are looking for...

Aug 15, 2009 00:03

... this is the speculation post re: the spoiler pics posted on SpoilerTV from episode 207 - The Two Live Crew Job. Stop reading now if you don't want to be spoiled at all.

( Seriously, stop reading. )

leverage

Comments 15

honeyjojames August 14 2009, 22:59:02 UTC

Good theory! I think you're probably right on both things... (And seriously, who wouldn't go to bed with Eliot?!)
I was wondering how they were going to get rid of Sophie without totally writing her out, so it probably is something like that... *waits impatiently for episodes to air*

cyphersushi August 14 2009, 23:05:04 UTC

I think you have to be dead or a lesbian to not want to go to bed with Eliot :) And yeah... where is that fast forward button for time?

badfalcon August 15 2009, 06:21:30 UTC

*raises hand as a lesbian who DOES want to go to bed with Eliot...*

cyphersushi August 15 2009, 10:20:10 UTC

Heh! See even that - Eliot is hot enough to appeal even to people with no interest in dicks. *hugs*

I respectfully disagree... havenward August 14 2009, 23:54:56 UTC

It's not a bad theory, but here's the thing: name on the casket aside, I know for a fact that Gina has been on set for several episodes (some of them recent) since 207 was filmed. Whether they're faking Sophie's death or not, she's not disappearing for the second half of the season. She'll have a reduced role, yes, but she's by no means off the show. At least no more than any good conwoman would need to. From the other photos, it doesn't seem like they're in Boston, and between Nate's brains and Hardison's geekery, I'm pretty sure they could cover all their tracks well enough to disappear the way they need to. Plus, it would make much more sense to fuck over anyone coming after Sophie, rather than hiding. Laying low would feel too much like the season 1 finale, and I don't know that they'd repeat that so quickly ( ... )

Re: I respectfully disagree... cyphersushi August 15 2009, 00:02:55 UTC

I did actaully take Gina still being on set in account - I didn't mean her laying low as in not on screen but rather holed up and helping the team on home ground (maybe in the apartment next to Nate's). So being on set and on screen but out of harms way :)

And they can introduce Ryan at the end of the episode - give the viewers something to ponder suring the hiatus.

If she is still being on screen I am darn curious over how they are gonna hide her tummy - I mean it's kinda visable on the 207 photos already (especially if you know it's there).

Re: I respectfully disagree... havenward August 15 2009, 00:07:23 UTC

Mmmm. I see now... Though, why am I suddenly remembering a tweet from Rogers about not making a pregnant woman run from explosions? It would lend credence to your theory, I think, though it ... could also imply she's more active. :frowns: I could be pulling that out of the air though...

Re: I respectfully disagree... cyphersushi August 15 2009, 00:11:26 UTC

I remember that tweet too but I think it was a reply to a lot of questions re her pregnancy. Like him reassuring us that he wouldn't make her do anything dangerous :)

neierathima August 15 2009, 00:52:33 UTC

I have no thoughts about theories of any sort. :) but can i say, Eliot, why did you wear the bandana/hat combo to a (fake) funeral?

Also, if the chick hitter and Eliot don't hook up I shall be very sad. Hopefully there will at be some good sexual tension at the very least.

cyphersushi August 15 2009, 01:07:49 UTC

He wore the bandana combo to hide his scar cause I guess it might be before he "gets" it (as he has it uncovered in a later picture). But yeah fashion-vice - not a good move :D

Yeah, Resolved Sexual Tension ftw :) I'd wish for a proper sex-scene but it doesn't seem to be in the show's style :)

trulybloom August 15 2009, 07:48:43 UTC

I don't want to be spoiled at all.

But, you put the ep title outside the cut.

Now I'm spoil. That makes my cry inside - in my special angry place.

:-{

cyphersushi August 15 2009, 10:24:23 UTC

Well, you could have stopped reading at the spoilerTV word, or at the title "speculation post" or at any other point.

I am sorry if you feel spoiled and sad in your angry place but I don't consider episode titles as spoilers. They are like booktitles and say next to nothing about the episode itself, especially as they are designed to be known before the actual episode is available.

I can't promise I won't slip and do it again.

trulybloom August 15 2009, 20:55:00 UTC

You're certainly welcome to post whatever you like in your own journal. It's absolutely not my place to tell you otherwise and I'm sorry that I did.

Mostly, it just didn't occur to me that it was your private journal (rather than a community) - and I thought it ironic that you warn not to read what was under the cut, but then put something some consider spoilery outside the cut.

I do think titles are spoilers - sometimes they do give away quite a lot. I know I'm not the only one who thinks this, but I'm sure the percentage is small.

Anyway, the point is, I over reacted. It's not your concern - especially not in your own journal - what I do or do not consider spoilery.

This is your place and, without question, you can do what pleases you. So, I apologize for my reply to your original post.

cyphersushi August 16 2009, 15:51:45 UTC

Apology accepted. I am just curious if you feel the same way about actual booktitles - cause if you do I can't imagine walking through book stores of libraries to much fun.

For me knowing the title of the next book/episode is like sniffing the air and knowing something nice is cooking. I might not know exactly what until I read/see/eat but it enchances the meal/book/episode with a bit of expectation beforehand.

Thread 5