I have some thoughts...

Jul 30, 2010 17:32

I'm really surprised no one else has mentioned this


Read more... )

show:lie to me

Leave a comment

Comments 5

(The comment has been removed)

gwassh0ppa July 31 2010, 14:33:24 UTC
And I don't see why Gillian was so flirty with Cal when she was with Burns.

Some women coughmecough, feel more comfortable being slightly more flirtatious with certain men because they know that it won't go anywhere. If the man understands that the woman is a monogomous kind of woman and wouldn't cheat, it tends to negate any reason for looking into the flirtation. And Cal, if anything, has always appeared respectful of Foster's... 'relationships'.

Is it bizarre? Heck yes? Do I understand why we do it? Goodness no. It ends up being more of a subconscious thing on my part until I realize what I've done.

And THAT is why we are the more complex of the species.

BTW, this timeline? WINS AT LIFE. Boggles my mind, but it wins.

Reply


sunspawn July 31 2010, 07:03:29 UTC
Maybe that's why they changed it all? Who knows, really....

Reply

bevfank July 31 2010, 08:07:39 UTC
Because 3 straight weeks of awesome might have killed the fangirls?

Reply

sunspawn July 31 2010, 09:07:49 UTC
Lol well it would have surely killed me :P There really is no telling what goes on in the FOX!brain.

Reply


tomellie August 1 2010, 00:54:33 UTC
I have thought about this too! Lol I don't think about much else ;) I do remember Kelli saying in an interview that she meets Burns in one episode and then in the next one they've been together for months... I guess that would explain the gap from Delinquent to Headlock.

I don't like to think about the fact that she's already dating Burns while she and Cal are doing "their walk" but I guess she is. At least they switched Sweet Sixteen and I'm really hoping Darkness and Light will be after Burns too...

So maybe Fox are trying to do the decent thing by mixing it around?? Who knows?? I'm tired and probably not making sense.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up