Where is the Prozac?dragonwitchlingMarch 25 2009, 08:13:04 UTC
I didn't wholly disagree with you about the AIG bonuses. I think it was heinously irresponsible of them to go ahead and give out the bonuses, especially when it turns out they were significantly more substantial than earlier reported. I wholeheartedly agree that a contract is a contract. If the terms are agreed to and they do not violate the law then they should be honored. It is a foundational concept both in business and law; PERIOD. What they should have done is simply renegotiated the contracts for significantly lower or nonexistent bonuses and this entire debacle would have been avoided. I disagree VERY much with the idea of arbitrarily using the tax code to penalize ANYONE, it sets a dangerous precedent and it is every bit as irresponsible as AIG's bonuses
( ... )
Re: While we're on the subject...dragonwitchlingMarch 27 2009, 02:52:47 UTC
Nice piece... I like it a lot. I think a lot of people, myself included didn't necessarily look to the individuals of the company. I am not shocked that the contracts were honored. They were made legitimately and negotiated properly, they SHOULD have been honored as they stood. I also cannot believe that they didn't consider renegotiation when they knew they were headed south in that giant hand basket. Sigh... no easy answers for anyone.
Comments 5
Cait
Reply
Reply
Reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/25/opinion/25desantis.html?_r=2&ref=opinion&pagewanted=all
Pretty interesting.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment