Unintelligent Design Theory

Oct 01, 2005 13:56

Unintelligent Design Network, Inc:

We hereby propose that a new debate be held, including members of the scientific community to argue that evolution should be taught as is, members of SEAO or the Intelligent Design Network, Inc. to argue that life shows evidence of an intelligent, omnipotent creator, and member of our organization to argue that ( Read more... )

science, creationism, politics, humor

Leave a comment

Comments 3

nellorat October 1 2005, 18:07:25 UTC
When someone else talked about Stupid Design and mentioned menstrual cramps, I wrote the following:

It's not just cramps--I mean, any intelligent design can go wrong if it hasn't been implemented quite right.

But look at the whole concept of menstruation itself! "We'll build a guest house on this rich, fertile property. And then, if no one comes to visit, we'll tear it all down. Then we build it up again, in case a guest arrives during the next month. But if not...."

Reply


pavlovs_dawg October 4 2005, 14:45:59 UTC
What about my theory of Intelligent Design.
We were made in the image of the Great Ape and our planet
is His Simiamness's excrement. See, makes as much sense as the big
boring book's fairy tales and angry invisible men.

Reply


nice example fried2styles November 22 2005, 05:58:16 UTC
I got here using the random search option and liked the `elephant-like creature` argument. A few weeks ago I did a `semi-formal` critique of the ID theory. Take a look!(I`d give you a direct link but I still haven`t figured everything out yet...)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up