IF YOU SEE THIS YOU HAVE TO COMMENT

[zookee]

I think we can bring LiveJournal back. We can do this by being awesome and talking about cool stuff. Anything but having to use Facebook.

If you see this post, then comment, ask a question, share something cool, post a link, anything.

And when you post a comment, read someone else's comment and comment on that! WE CAN DISCUSSION!

Talk soon :)

Comments

[rehgan]

I HAVE SEEN THIS, AND THUS, I COMMENT.

If someone does not comment, I am inclined to believe they have not seen this journal. And since this journal exists, and I have seen it, if someone does not comment, I am forced to believe they do not exist.

Discuss the ramifications of not existing, because I refuse to toss "they're just lazy" into the logic. Hoping everyone exists!

[ccroft]

I have never existed. I have always been an electronic manifestation of the collective subconscious' desire for there to be more bodybuilding writery British barista's living in New Zealand.

[rehgan]

I KNEW IT. You fiend!

But you are a fairly intelligent electronic manifestation. And if you are indeed an electronic manifestation, do you not, then, indeed exist?

[shepherdwolf]

i'm pretty sure existing is a requirement for having been manifested. in fact, i'm pretty sure existing is THE DEFINITION of having been manifested lolololol. :3

POINT WIGER.

ALSO CROFT HOW COULD YOU CORRECTLY APOSTROPHE THE POSSESSIVE FORM OF "SUBCONSCIOUS," which most people can't even SAY let alone SPELL, AND THEN STICK ONE IN THE PLURAL FORM OF BARISTAS AAHHHHH YOU DID THIS TO HURT ME DIDN'T YOU *runs off sobbing*

*head explode*

[bailiff]

Actually, the correct form would be "subconscious's". S followed by apostrophe is strictly for a plural modifier (teachers = teachers' room, kittens = kittens' bells). In this case, "subconscious" is singular (hence "THE collective subconscious") - the fact that the last letter is an S makes no difference. The possessive form still has to be marked by an apostrophe followed by an S.

Hence, Richard Adams's "Watership Down", and not Richard Adams' "Watership Down".

(I hope Zookee notices all this discussion.)

[zookee]

It's a very niche market, and you fill it well. Emphasis on the "fill" ;)

[zookee]

AWESOME.

I think we can take for granted that everyone in the world has sen this journal, because:

i) It's my journal, and
ii) Bitch plz.

Therefore we can logically infer than only the people who comment on it are actually real. The rest of the entire world are figments of our (referring to the people who comment on this thread) collective immagination.

In other words: There are no lazy people, only people who aren't real.

At least we know that we exist, right buddy? :D

Also, OMG go see Inception right now. Best movie I've seen all year. Holy shit.

[kint]

Inception is very much on the to-do list. I'm not sure exactly when as this weekend and the coming week are absolutely insane, but it will happen.

[zookee]

MAKE TIME FOR IT!

[kint]

We most certainly shall!

[ccroft]

I'm seeing Inception tonight. It only came out in NZ yesterday :3

(But at least we'll get to see The Hobbit before anyone else, biznatches.)

[zookee]

Look forward to chattting about it with you. I know you'll enjoy it immensely :)

[rehgan]

You make good points and I find your conclusion that the world has only real and unreal people to be quite accurate. There is no way this could be false.

Yay for existing!

Also, Jen totally wants to see Inception so it's totally on the list of things to do. Also Despicable Me. The latter may come first, but both must be had.

Fun Fact: She's actually partaken in the dream-reality sort of thing that Inception refers to! At least in part. I don't know exactly what the movie is about or how accurate it is to the phenomenon, but, you know. Still fun facts. My girl is crazy awesome.